Time Evolution of the Complex Scalar Field

Xenosum
Messages
18
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Consider the Lagrangian, L, given by

L = \partial_{\mu}\phi^{*}(x)\partial^{\mu}\phi(x) - m^2\phi^{*}(x)\phi(x) .

The conjugate momenta to \phi(x) and \phi^{*}(x) are denoted, respectively, by \pi(x) and \pi^{*}(x). Thus,

\pi(x) = \frac{\partial L}{\partial(\partial_{0}\phi(x))} = \partial_0\phi^{*}(x)
\pi^{*}(x) = \frac{\partial L}{\partial(\partial_{0}\phi^{*}(x))} = \partial_0\phi(x) .

Upon quantizing the system, \phi(x) and \phi^{*}(x) are promoted to operators which satisfy the equal-time commutation relations:

[ \phi(x) , \pi(y) ] = i\delta^{(3)}(\vec{x} - \vec{y})
[ \phi^{*}(x) , \pi^{*}(y) ] = i\delta^{(3)}(\vec{x} - \vec{y})

(all others zero). In the Heisenberg regime, the time evolution of the operator \phi(x), i \partial_0 \phi(x), is given by

i \partial_0 \phi(x) = \left[ \phi(x) , H(y) \right].

The Hamiltonian may be derived from the Lagrangian, and we find that

i\frac{\partial \phi(x)}{\partial t} = \int d^{3}y \left( \left[ \phi(x) , \pi(y)\pi^{*}(y) \right] + \left[ \phi(x) , \nabla\phi^{*}(y) \cdot \nabla\phi(y) \right] + m^2 \left[ \phi(x) , \phi^{*}(y)\phi(y) \right] \right).

Now here's my question. When we evaluate the commutators both my professor and a solution manual to Peskin and Schroeder claim that only the first commutator survives, because \phi(x) commutes with everything except for the its conjugate momentum (by the canonical commutation relations). I don't see why. The canonical commutation relations only give us a relationship between \phi(x) and \pi(y), not e.g. \phi(x) and \phi(y). The point is pressed by the fact that one can only show that the commutator \left[ \phi(x) , \phi(y) \right] vanishes for space-like separation between the points x and y (this is the condition which preserves causality).

I guess it would be resolved if the commutator were instead \left[ \phi(x) , H(x) \right], but this doesn't seem to be how it's done.

Thanks for any help!

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Xenosum said:
In the Heisenberg regime, the time evolution of the operator ϕ(x) \phi(x) , i∂0ϕ(x) i \partial_0 \phi(x) , is given by

i∂0ϕ(x)=[ϕ(x),H(y)].​

The Hamiltonian really should be the Hamiltonian at time ##x^0 = y^0## (note that you are integrating over the spatial components of ##y##). As a result, ##x## and ##y## have space-like separation and the commutator ##[\phi(x),\phi(y)]## vanishes (they are even equal-time).
 
  • Like
Likes Xenosum
Cool, thanks!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top