B Time-evolving Fourier transform

entropy1
Messages
1,232
Reaction score
72
I am a little familiar with Fourier Analysis, but I don't know where to get tools to get the answer to this question:

Consider a discrete signal A[0..N-1], consisting of N samples. Suppose we Fourier transform it and get a series of harmonics.

Now, consider the discrete signal A[1..N], that is equal to signal A[0..N-1] on the corresponding indices [1..N-1], and has the next sample AN added to it, to obtain N indices.

We subject the second signal to Fourier transform too.

Will the set of harmonics of the first signal and the set of harmonics of the second be quite similar (having similar amplitudes), or could they differ considerably?

I relate this to a spectral analyser display of audio signals. If the Fourier transform is done on a fixed interval, each next transform done from one sample further on, the (virtual) frequencies in the audio signal shouldn't jump around too much on that instance, should they? I am not sure about white noise though.

I hope the question is clear. Answers are very welcome!
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You are right. The idea of the Fourier transform is to decompose a signal from the time domain into its frequency content. That should not change due to a one-sample shift. You would not expect a guitar string to sound different just because you plucked it a fraction of a second later.

EDIT: If the first point of the first series shows a very sharp transient from it to the second point, then there might be more high frequency content in the first series. It takes a lot of high frequency to make a step function. But if there is nothing special about that first point, it should not make much difference.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes entropy1
Hey entropy1.

It might make sense to do the actual integral over a number of harmonics for a number of functions to see the effects itself for a class of functions.

As FactChecker pointed out above - it will depend on the function quite a lot along with the size of the window you have that is different between the two functions.
 
  • Like
Likes entropy1
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top