Time for falling down the incline (Rotating Solid Cylinder)

Click For Summary
A solid cylinder is spun on an incline with a coefficient of friction equal to the tangent of the incline's angle. The discussion revolves around determining the time it continues to spin before rolling down the incline. Participants clarify that the cylinder initially spins without moving down due to friction, which eventually ceases when the angular momentum is drained. Once the cylinder stops spinning, gravity causes it to roll down the incline, transitioning from slipping to rolling without slipping. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the forces and torques involved in this motion.
  • #31
Vibhor said:
How did you assume rolling without slipping condition a = rα ?

Are you suggesting that we should assume this constraint and from this we find the static frictional force F and then prove that this F < μsN . Thereby concluding that since the frictional force required for rolling without slipping is less than μsN , rolling without slipping occurs .

But if we had obtained F > μsN , we could have argued that slipping does occur as friction is not sufficient .

Am I understanding it correctly ?

a=rα comes out from simple geometry.
Take a roll of paper and mark the end of the sheet. Keep this end fixed and make the cylinder of paper roll, while the sheet unwounding. When the mark returns to the original position, below the centre, the length of the removed sheet is equal to the displacement of the centre and equal to the circumference of the cross-sectional circle. You can check by wounding it back. The end will be at the mark. X=2Rπ. For an arbitrary angle of turn, X=Rθ. The first derivative is V=Rω, and the second derivative is a=Rα.

ehild
 

Attachments

  • rollsheet.JPG
    rollsheet.JPG
    16.2 KB · Views: 412
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
By now it seems as if I am the one who started this thread :-p .

There is so much to learn here . Thanks ehild :smile: .

This question has raised another possibility that what would happen if instead of μ =tanθ as given , μ > tanθ .

Do you think if μ > tanθ ,then the cylinder moves up the incline after being placed on it ? Can the net force on the cylinder be upwards i.e frictional force F be greater than mgsinθ ?
 
  • #33
Vibhor said:
This question has raised another possibility that what would happen if instead of μ =tanθ as given , μ > tanθ .

Do you think if μ > tanθ ,then the cylinder moves up the incline after being placed on it ? Can the net force on the cylinder be upwards i.e frictional force F be greater than mgsinθ ?

Yes, it can. The cylinder will gain upward velocity while its spinning slows down. At an instant V=Rω, so the rolling condition holds, the friction becomes static and gravity exceeding it. The cylinder will roll without slipping upward till the KE transforms completely to potential energy. From there on, the cylinder rolls downward.
Try it with a bicycle wheel...

ehild
 
Last edited:
  • #34
ehild said:
At an instant V=Rω, so the rolling condition holds, and it will roll without slipping upward till the KE transforms completely to potential energy.
ehild

Is it right to say that in any situation whether the cylinder is moving up or moving down , once the cylinder achieves the no slipping condition V=Rω , it maintains this motion ? What I mean is that as soon as the cylinder rolls without slipping for the first time ,there is no possibility of slipping and the cylinder rolls without slipping thereafter .

Thank you for your patience . I am really gaining from this discussion.
 
  • #35
Vibhor said:
Is it right to say that in any situation whether the cylinder is moving up or moving down , once the cylinder achieves the no slipping condition V=Rω , it maintains this motion ? What I mean is that as soon as the cylinder rolls without slipping for the first time ,there is no possibility of slipping and the cylinder rolls without slipping thereafter .

It looks so...

Vibhor said:
Thank you for your patience . I am really gaining from this discussion.

You are welcome. And accept my advice: Do experiments whenever possible. You learn a lot from them.

ehild
 
  • #36
ehild said:
there is a mistake in your equation.

ehild
That's an alpha (α), not an a.
 
  • #37
Vibhor said:
Are you suggesting that we should assume this constraint and from this we find the static frictional force F and then prove that this F < μsN . Thereby concluding that since the frictional force required for rolling without slipping is less than μsN , rolling without slipping occurs .

But if we had obtained F > μsN , we could have argued that slipping does occur as friction is not sufficient .

Am I understanding it correctly ?
Yes.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K