Time Independent Rotational Kinematics equation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the search for a "time independent rotational kinematics equation" to determine angular acceleration without time constraints. The original poster expresses frustration at not finding this equation in their textbook or online, especially with an impending test. Other participants suggest that posting the specific problem in a homework section could yield better assistance. There is uncertainty about the existence of such an equation, indicating a need for clarification on rotational kinematics concepts. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges of studying rotational motion under time constraints.
KatParker35
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Time Independent Rotational Kinematics equation?

Ok i was trying to figure out the angular acceleration for a problem, but i didn't have the time...so the book said to use the "time independent rotational kinematics equation" but i couldn't find it in the book anywhere or even on the net...soooooo if anyone has any idea bout this, it'd be great, cause i have a massive test in like 10 hrs and I'm pulllin an all nighter so i'll be back to check this later...THANKS!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have trouble with a problem, why don't you post it. In the Homework section. You'll get much more feedback and help then since it gives something concrete to help you with. I've never heard of time-independent rotational kinematics equations, but if I see the problem I might get an idea about what you're talking.
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

Rotational Kinematics - angle between force and velocity
Replies
7
Views
6K
Finding the location of a kinematic particle in motion based on time.
Replies
1
Views
2K
Kinematic Equation vs. Delta velocity / Delta Time - Factor of 2?
Replies
2
Views
3K
Confusing regarding Kinematic Equations
Replies
3
Views
3K
Senior Project - Quadcopter with Rotating Arms
Replies
1
Views
2K
Puzzling precession of the torque-free symmetric top
Replies
13
Views
5K
What is the net acceleration of the coin on a rotating disk?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Rotation Mechanics about Unfixed Points
Replies
2
Views
3K
The Equations of Rotational Kinematics help
Replies
4
Views
2K
Rotational kinematics of a turntable
Replies
6
Views
7K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top