Time it takes for a wave to travel up and down a rope?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the time it takes for a wave pulse to travel up and down a rope, using the length of the rope (l) and its mass (m). The solution involves applying Newton's Second Law to determine the wave velocity, which is derived from the tension in the rope. The time is then calculated using the formula time = distance/velocity, with the total distance being twice the length of the rope. There is mention of alternative methods involving sine and cosine, but the straightforward approach seems sufficient. The key question raised is whether the wave velocity remains constant along the rope.
scarlson1193
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A man brushes the end of a rope that sends a pulse up the rope to the fixed end of the rope and back down to the bottom. How long does it take the pulse to make the trip from the bottom of the rope, to the top, and back? Let the length of the rope be l and its mass m.

Homework Equations



Newton's Second Law of Motion (where velocity is equal to the square root of the force of tension times mass divided by the length of the rope) and time = distance/velocity.

The Attempt at a Solution



We took Newton's Second Law of Motion and basically isolated velocity. From there, we simply plugged velocity into time=distance/velocity. We would then multiply that by two to get the time for it to travel up and down the rope. Is this reasoning right? Our professor was talking to another group about the same problem and they started talking about sine and cosine and it was terribly complicated, but it seems like working it out like this would work as well.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: Is the wave velocity constant along the rope?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top