Time Lag in Calls: Experiment & Confirmations

  • Thread starter Thread starter ashishsinghal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
AI Thread Summary
There is a notable time lag when making calls using a mobile phone, attributed to multiple factors in the signal processing chain. An experiment demonstrated that the perceived lag is approximately 0.25 seconds, based on the difference in timing between a song played and a friend's response. The delays arise from various stages, including sound reception, digital conversion, and transmission to and from cell towers. Despite the speed of light, these processes collectively contribute to the overall latency experienced during calls. Understanding these delays is essential for recognizing that communication is not instantaneous.
ashishsinghal
Messages
462
Reaction score
0
I was wondering how much time lag would be there if one called in a local place using mobile phone. I did a simple experiment which showed that there is a considerable time lag. Can anyone further confirm this?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There are several sources of "time lag" in digital transceivers.

1) Rx of Sound and A/D conversion and processing.
2) Transmission to Cell Tower.
3) Cell Tower processing and routing.
4) Transmission from cell tower to cell tower.
5) Second Cell Tower processing and queuing.
6) Transmission from Cell Tower.
7) Rx of Digital packet, processing and D/A conversion.

The fact that all of this typically takes place in the mS to Second time domain is astonishing!

Fish
 
Err...I should have told you that I am just in high school and hence have no idea of what you are talking about. I will tell you my experiment.
I called a friend, turned on a song and asked him to sing along with the song. If he hears the song after t seconds, he will start singing after t second. his voice will also come to me after t seconds. so the difference in beats that I hear directly and from him is 2t.
On casually listening the difference was about 0.5 seconds. so the lag would be about 0.25s.
Is it correct?
 
ashishsinghal said:
Err...I should have told you that I am just in high school and hence have no idea of what you are talking about. I will tell you my experiment.
I called a friend, turned on a song and asked him to sing along with the song. If he hears the song after t seconds, he will start singing after t second. his voice will also come to me after t seconds. so the difference in beats that I hear directly and from him is 2t.
On casually listening the difference was about 0.5 seconds. so the lag would be about 0.25s.
Is it correct?

The simple version: there are delays in the signal path of the phone so what you say into your phone is not instantaneously appearing on the remote phone - it takes some time. A lot of it is because though the speed of light is fast, it's not infinitely fast.

So yes, in summary, you are correct. The list given by the other respondent is simply the explicated source of each component delay that adds up to what you experience.
 
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Back
Top