Time-reversal operator for fermions (Sakurai)

Sdakouls
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
In Modern Quantum Mechanics (2nd ed.) by J.J. Sakurai, in section 4.4 on 'The Time-Reversal Discrete Symmetry' he derives the time-reversal operator, \Theta, for the spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ case as (pg.: 277, eq. (4.4.65)):

\Theta = \eta e^{\frac{-i \pi S_{y}}{\hbar}}K = -i \eta \left( \frac{2S_{y}}{\hbar} \right) K

where \eta is some arbitrary unit magnitude complex number, S_{y} is the y-component of the spin operator and K is the complex conjugation operator.

Now, I can follow everything he does, except this last equality. I don't know how/why he is able to write down this last equality (I know it's not some kind of Taylor expansion because of the absence of \pi on the RHS). If anyone could shed any light on this, it'd be most appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Work in a basis where S_y/\hbar is diagonal with eigenvalues \pm1/2. You can check that the last equality is valid for each eigenvalue; therefore it is valid as a matrix equation.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top