Time stopped for a photon travelling at the speed of light?

mildpiranha
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
time "stopped" for a photon traveling at the speed of light?

Is time "stopped" for a photon traveling at the speed of light? Or is this a nonsensical question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


From the photon's point of view, it arrives at its destination immediately after leaving, in zero time. It can travel through the entire universe in no time at all, literally, which is logical since in its frame of reference it also travels zero distance.

From our point of view, obviously, it's just traveling at the speed of light so it may take millions of years to reach its destination.

It's a bit like the space traveler who leaves on a long space trip. As he accelerates to nearly the speed of light, space around him shrinks (in the direction of movement) so that distant galaxies suddenly become so close that he can reach them in a few years. Same thing for the return trip. However, as seen from the earth, he will have been away for millions of years. In fact, the Earth may not even exist anymore when he tries to come back.

The photon is just the same, only it travels AT the speed of light, so lengths are shrunk to zero and travel takes no time at all, in its frame of reference.

If I'm not mistaken, this also means a photon, or any other particle traveling at the speed of light, will never decay since it doesn't have time to do so.
 


This is really a nonsensical question, since the rest frame of a photon is not a valid reference frame.

As the article posted by michelcolman points out, we can ask what happens as we get closer and closer to the speed of light. This question makes sense, since all the reference frames we would be in would be valid.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
93
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
735
Back
Top