Time-symmetry in electromagnetism: a simple puzzle

AI Thread Summary
Maxwell's equations are considered time-symmetric, yet a puzzling scenario arises when examining the attraction between two opposite charges. In a time-reversed context, it seems they would repel each other, but the discussion clarifies that attractive forces remain attractive even when time is reversed. The dynamics of the particles change based on their initial conditions, but the fundamental nature of the force does not. Gravity is used as an analogy, demonstrating that attractive forces maintain their characteristics in both time directions. The conversation concludes with a reaffirmation of the consistency of forces under time reversal, emphasizing the importance of understanding the underlying physics.
ConradDJ
Gold Member
Messages
319
Reaction score
1
All basic laws of physics are said to respect CPT symmetry, and Maxwell's equations in particular are time-symmetric. But here's a simple scenario I find very puzzling:

Two particles of opposite charge attract each other. In the time-reversed picture, they'd repel each other, no? But they remain opposite charges, whether under time-reversal or CPT-reversal. So it seems that the laws of electromagnetism aren't time-symmetric after all.

There has to be an obvious answer, but my aging brain won't come up with it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They will attract each other in both cases.
In both cases, they will accelerate away from each other.
In one case, you start with them at a distance heading straight for each other - and they are accelerating as they approach each other.
In the other case, they start close to each other - but with velocity vectors pointing away from each other. They decelerate as they move away from each other.

Let's use gravity as the force. It will pull whether time goes forward or backward. Something can be in orbit and if you reverse time, it is still in orbit - but going in the same direction. In both cases, gravity is attracting them it towards the planet. Toss a rock into the air. In reverse, it bounces from the ground goes up to a highest point, and then falls into your hand.
 
ConradDJ said:
Two particles of opposite charge attract each other. In the time-reversed picture, they'd repel each other, no?
No, the time reverse of an attractive force is still an attractive force. For example, a parabolic path pointing towards one direction is still a parabolic path pointing in the same direction when time reversed.
 
Thanks for the clear and timely responses -- very helpful. (Though I assume .Scott meant to say, "In both cases, they will accelerate towards each other."
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
It's easily seen from Newton's 2nd law (you can of course also argue within SRT): ##\vec{F}=m \vec{a}##. Since under time reversal ##t \rightarrow -t##, ##\vec{x} \rightarrow \vec{x}##, and ##m \rightarrow m##. Thus ##\vec{a}=\ddot{\vec{x}} \rightarrow \ddot{\vec{x}}##, and thus also ##\vec{F} \rightarrow \vec{F}##.

You can also argue directly with Coulomb's Law. Of course here you need in addition ##q \rightarrow +q## under time reversal. This also implies that ##\vec{E} \rightarrow \vec{E}## and ##\vec{B} \rightarrow -\vec{B}##.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top