Time taken to absorb neutrons,photons

  • Thread starter Thread starter kurious
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
kurious
Messages
633
Reaction score
0
How long do particles take to change their mometum when they "bounce"
off a surface and when they are absorbed by a surface?
Do photons have a noticeably different "bounce" and absorption time to particles with rest mass?
Can a neutron have a rest mass and be at rest in reality rather than just in theory?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Photons cannot ever change their speed, so they do not bounce. They are absorbed by an atom, then the atom emits a new photon in another direction.

Neutrons have zero residual (external) electronic charge, but their component quarks can interact either via the electromagnetic or strong forces with other particles. Depending upon the angles involved in the collision, I'd expect a neutron to be either be scattered by a nucleus ("bouncing"), or captured by a nucleus.

Neutrons can certainly be at rest in reality.

- Warren
 
I meant to ask: can a neutrino be at rest in reality and not just in theory?
 
kurious said:
I meant to ask: can a neutrino be at rest in reality and not just in theory?

If the neutrinos have even a small mass, the answer is yes. Nobody has trapped one, but someday it may be done.
 
Over what sort of timescale does a photon reflect off a mirror back along the direction it came from, and the same for an electron "reflected" by a solid surface.
 
As has been said, the photon doesn't reflect. It's absorbed, then a new photon is emitted. I suppose the time scale is comparable to the lifetime of an excited atomic state, something on the order of nanoseconds or less I believe. As for an electron, this can be treated clasically, and I think it depends on the properties of the reflecting medium.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top