I Time to Form Black Hole? | Observer Slows Time at Event Horizon

Cobalt101
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Is it correct that, from the perspective of an observer, time slows down and ultimately stops at the event horizon of a black hole, implying that no black holes have had time to form in the universe ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cobalt101 said:
Is it correct that, from the perspective of an observer, time slows down and ultimately stops at the event horizon of a black hole, implying that no black holes have had time to form in the universe ?

No. A massive object only takes a finite time to collapse to a black hole, according to an observer falling in with the collapse; and an observer falling into a black hole that already exists only takes a finite time by his own clock to reach the hole's horizon.
 
PeterDonis said:
No. A massive object only takes a finite time to collapse to a black hole, according to an observer falling in with the collapse; and an observer falling into a black hole that already exists only takes a finite time by his own clock to reach the hole's horizon.
Thanks - but the observer I was referring to was not falling in with the object, but rather was watching from a distance. So in particular if a black hole is formed by a collapsing star, from the perspective of the rest of the universe does the black hole ever form? (I understand that from the perspective of the collapsing star it only takes a finite time).
 
I think the observer would see what had been the star becoming increasingly red shifted until it was no longer visible.
However if it is gravitationally bound, say in a binary system, it could be detected indirectly that way, and possibly there might be a hot and visible accretion disk of remnant material surrounding the event horizon of what now is a black hole.
 
Last edited:
Cobalt101 said:
if a black hole is formed by a collapsing star, from the perspective of the rest of the universe does the black hole ever form?

There is no such thing as "from the perspective of the rest of the universe". The black hole is a feature of the global spacetime geometry; either it is there or it isn't. If the collapsing object forms a horizon in a finite time, or an infalling observer reaches the horizon in a finite time, then the black hole is there. The fact that the distant observer can't see it doesn't change that.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Back
Top