I TISE solutions should be combinations-of-eigenstates, why this is not?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter JackeTheDog132
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum phyics
JackeTheDog132
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Why a wave pocket is not a solution of the TISE?
I would really appreciate some help with a question I have aboute the TISE (Sch. tipe indipendent equation). This is a linear equation and linear combination of the solution should be solution too. The problem is that for the free particle, which solution can be written like exp[-ikx], a linear combination using gaussian coefficent is not anymore a solution (we should get a wave pocket this way). Of course taking a combination considering the temporal dipendence give a solution to the TDSE. My question is why that does not appen in the TISE case.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
:welcome:

Can you express your question more mathematically? I'm not sure what you are asking.
 
PeroK said:
Can you express your question more mathematically? I'm not sure what you are asking.
I agree. It also sounds like you are trying to model a traveling wave with a time-independent model, which of course will not work.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
JackeTheDog132 said:
This is a linear equation and linear combination of the solution should be solution too.
Careful. What you are calling the "TISE" is not a single equation. It is many different equations, one for each different eigenvalue. So the only case where you can form a linear combination of solutions to get another solution is degeneracy, i.e., there are multiple eigenvectors with the same eigenvalue.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top