TLC Analysis of a Synthesis Reaction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a synthesis reaction analysis using TLC (Thin Layer Chromatography). Key questions include the success of the synthesis if the reaction halts after two hours, the mechanism of hydrogen attacking compound 2 to form compound 3, and the interpretation of TLC results at one and two hours. It is noted that after two hours, compound 1 is more abundant than compound 2, suggesting compound 1 is less polar and likely the main product. Participants seek clarification on the reaction dynamics, including the behavior of the OH group in compound 2 and the implications of Rf values in identifying products.
irunshow
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
This is the link for the assignment: http://imageshack.us/f/840/assignmentsynthesisofev.jpg/


Homework Statement



Given in the link

Homework Equations



Why would the proposed synthesis be successful if the reaction stopped after 2 hrs?
How does H attack compound 2 to create compound 3?

The Attempt at a Solution



After 2 hrs. Compound 1 is higher than compound 2. Compound 1 is less polar than compound 2. So if that was the case, than the products would be compound 2.

I don't understand why H would react with the OH group and detach it away from Compound 2.


Thank you for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to answer the following:

1. Why at 1 hour are there two spots and what do they represent. Draw them in ChemDraw.
2. What is likely in the pot at two hours.
3. Why is this initially-formed product at a lower Rf than the starting material.
4. Is it possible that the second product formed was a reaction product of your starting material and why or why not?
5. What is the likely structure of the second product. Use ChemDraw.
 
^^ Thanks
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top