TNT vs Thermonuclear Explosions: 50Mt Effects & Radiation

  • Thread starter Thread starter dubau2
  • Start date Start date
dubau2
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Would an exposion created by 50 Mt of TnT look any different than a 50Mt nuclear explosion? Would there be any difference than radiation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dubau2 said:
Would an exposion created by 50 Mt of TnT look any different than a 50Mt nuclear explosion? Would there be any difference than radiation?

Ok I'll try to answer what you mean instead of what you ask... :)

Radiation is more than the fall out and people loosing their hair, radiation is also "normal" electromagnetic radiation like light and radio waves, which makes all the difference. The flash of light is so intense that it burns dark clothes, as you can still see on pictures in Hiroshima how the patterns of kimonos were burned onto the skin of the person wearing it. A well placed atomic bomb can cause a strong electromagnetic pulse knocking out most electronic appliances. The shock wave that can be achieved with atomic bombs will also be different, because traditional explosives have a certain natural expansion speed, whereas atomic bombs produce that speed simply by becoming really hot.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top