To add more ions, but not get any precipitate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter angela107
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenge of manipulating ion concentrations in a solution without causing precipitation. The initial idea involves removing Cl- ions to allow for the addition of Ag+ ions, but participants emphasize the necessity of maintaining electrical neutrality by replacing Cl- with other ions. The conversation highlights the importance of the method used to remove Cl- and suggests practical solutions, such as using an anion exchange resin to substitute Cl- with NO3-, thereby creating a solution of AgNO3. The need for clarity on the underlying problem or goal is also noted, indicating that the motivations behind these actions are not fully articulated.
angela107
Messages
35
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
I'm given an equilibrium, what can I do if I wanted to add more silver ions and not get more precipitate?
Here's an image of the equilibrium
Screen Shot 2020-06-10 at 5.50.38 PM.png

I'm not sure how that's possible, but I'm thinking maybe I could remove Cl- ion so that the Ag+ ions don't have much to combine with.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Not sure what you really mean. Yes, you are limited by the solubility and you can't add more Ag+ than defined by the concentration of Cl-. Yes, removing Cl- will allow adding more Ag+. But I have a feeling that can be only tangential to what you are really trying to achieve/solve/answer.
 
angela107 said:
I'm thinking maybe I could remove Cl- ion

You can't just remove ions - no matter how you plan to do that in practice (some details would be helpful). You need to replace them with other ions in order to keep the solution electrically neutral and it makes a difference if you replace Cl- with I- or with NO3- (for example).
 
Borek said:
Not sure what you really mean. Yes, you are limited by the solubility and you can't add more Ag+ than defined by the concentration of Cl-. Yes, removing Cl- will allow adding more Ag+. But I have a feeling that can be only tangential to what you are really trying to achieve/solve/answer.
I wasn't told to perform an action that could disrupt the equilibrium, I just need to find a way to add ions by any means necessary as long as I don't produce any precipitate. Removing Cl- ions could do the job...
 
angela107 said:
I just need to find a way to add ions by any means necessary as long as I don't produce any precipitate.

Does that mean you may also add something else in addition to Ag+ (e.g. NH3)?

angela107 said:
Removing Cl- ions could do the job...

Yes it could. But it matters how you do it. How do you plan to remove Cl- ions?
 
DrStupid said:
Does that mean you may also add something else in addition to Ag+ (e.g. NH3)?
Yes it could. But it matters how you do it. How do you plan to remove Cl- ions?
If I remove the Cl- ions, I would have to replace them with something else, as long as there is no precipitate involved.
 
angela107 said:
If I remove the Cl- ions, I would have to replace them with something else, as long as there is no precipitate involved.

Yes, but what would you replace them with and how would you do that in practice? I have no clear picture of what you want to do and why.
 
You could pass the solution through an anion exchange resin charged with the anion you want to add in place of Cl-. If it’s nitrate, charge the resin with ammonium nitrate, rinse well and then pass the AgCl solution through and exchange the Cl- with NO3-. Now you have a solution of AgNO3. You have changed the equilibrium because [Cl-] is essentially zero.

Add all the Ag+ you want to at that point (as the nitrate, of course).

I have no idea why you would want to do this...
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara
This sounds like a homework problem, without the included problem statement...
@angela107 is there a problem statement you could include?
 
Back
Top