To find total work done from multiple reversible processes

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the total work done from multiple reversible processes involving an ideal gas. In the first part, the isochoric process results in zero work done, with the final pressure being double the initial pressure due to a temperature increase. The second part involves an isothermal process where the final volume is half of the initial volume, leading to a negative work calculation, which raises questions about the gas's expansion. The final part returns to the original state with isobaric work calculated based on the change in volume. Participants suggest reviewing the calculations and ensuring clarity on whether the work is done on or by the gas, as well as accurately tracking pressure, temperature, and volume throughout the processes.
warhammer
Messages
164
Reaction score
33
Homework Statement
One mole of an ideal gas is heated isochorically till its temperature is doubled. Then it is expanded isothermally till it reaches the original pressure. Finally it is cooled by an isobaric process and restored to the original state. By assuming all the processes to be reversible, show that the resultant work done is RT [2 log 2-1].
Relevant Equations
Isothermal W= nRT ln (V(2)/V(1))
Isobaric W= P (V(2)-V(1))
The question is given in 3 parts.

For first part, process is isochoric so Work done=0. We know here that at end of the process (a), T2=T1 while V remains constant (we can take it as V1) so P2=2P1.

For second part, process is isothermal so T is constant. At end of process we reach P1 again from 2P1, thus V2 for the end stage of this process=V1/2. Isothermal W= RT ln (1/2)

For the last part, original state is restored. Thus final volume for this particular state is V1 from V1/. P is kept constant. Thus Isobaric W = P1 (V1-V1/2)= (P1V1)/2.

Adding first and third results we will not get the value expressed in solution. I would be very grateful if someone looked over my solution and offered guidance as to where I am making the error..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
warhammer said:
Homework Statement:: One mole of an ideal gas is heated isochorically till its temperature is doubled. Then it is

warhammer said:
For first part, process is isochoric so Work done=0. We know here that at end of the process (a), T2=T1 while V remains constant (we can take it as V1) so P2=2P1.
If the temperarure is doubled, then T₂ = 2T₁ (not T₂ = T₁).

I haven't checked anything else in detail but also note that you need to be clear if you are being asked for the work done on the gas or the work done by the gas.
 
warhammer said:
For second part, process is isothermal so T is constant. At end of process we reach P1 again from 2P1, thus V2 for the end stage of this process=V1/2. Isothermal W= RT ln (1/2)
Note that your expression for ##W## is negative. Does this make sense if the gas is expanding?

Adding first and third results we will not get the value expressed in solution. I would be very grateful if someone looked over my solution and offered guidance as to where I am making the error..
You seem to have made a number of simple mistakes or you made a bunch of typos. I suggest you carefully determine the pressure, temperature, and volume at the beginning and end of each process.
 
State 1: T, V, P
State 2: 2T, V, 2P
State 3: 2T, 2V, P
State 4: T, V, P

Show these on a P-V diagram
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top