To take Intro physics class or not to take intro physics class

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether to take an algebra-based introductory physics course before enrolling in a calculus-based physics course required for a Chemical Engineering major. Participants agree that taking the introductory course can provide valuable exposure to fundamental physics concepts, which may aid in understanding higher-level courses. While some suggest that if the student is not interested in theoretical physics, the algebra-based course could suffice, others emphasize the importance of programming skills and recommend prioritizing a programming class if it aligns better with the curriculum. The consensus is that while the introductory course can be beneficial, it ultimately depends on individual academic goals and scheduling considerations.
Metta
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Hi, fellas, I am back again with more questions.:smile: Those who've seen my posts here might recall that I have never been exposed to physics ever before, and now majoring in Chem E, I'll be taking loads of it. I've delayed taking the physics 1 until spring next year because it's calc based and I am taking calc this fall. I have an spot open in my schedule for fall, I was thinking of taking an intro to physics class. Part of me says you don't need it while the other part of me says, it can only do good and expose you to what's to be expected in higher level physics classes.

Question: Do you guys think this would help? Thanks.

and yes intro to physics is algebra based.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the exposure is good, I don't see any reason why you shouldn't, unless there are scheduling concerns?
 
I was going to take a programming class but it seems that class will have to be replaced as it is not as important.
 
If you aren't planning to do upper-level theoretical work in physics, then you have more options in terms of when to take either an algebra or calculus based intro-to-physics course.

I don't know the requirement for your curriculum but it would be unreasonable to take two lower-level physics course because they differ in mathematical rigor. All introductory physics courses covers the basics of classical mechanics, electrodynamics, and some thermodynamics.

If you want a challenge and a more intimate understanding of physics concepts (which might supplement your understanding of chemistry), wait to take the calc-based physics course.

If you're uninterested in the applications of calc and you're taking physics to meet a requirement, take the algebra-based physics course. You'll always have a safety net (plug-and-chug) to rely on, even if you don't understand the concepts.
 
Metta said:
I was going to take a programming class but it seems that class will have to be replaced as it is not as important.

:confused:

Programming knowledge is incredibly useful. If you're already required to take calculus-based physics for your degree, I would highly advise taking a programming course over algebra-based physics.
 
Last edited:
If you can't take physics with calculus I would take the intro course for the time being. I really wished I would have done so, but then again I didn't have the best high school physics course. Physics isn't a course you take once and close the book, you can always gain a deeper understanding with each encounter with the material.
 
TL;DR Summary: What topics to cover to safely say I know arithmetic ? I am learning arithmetic from Indian NCERT textbook. Currently I have finished addition ,substraction of 2 digit numbers and divisions, multiplication of 1 digit numbers. I am moving pretty slowly. Can someone tell me what topics to cover first to build a framework and then go on in detail. I want to learn fast. It has taken me a year now learning arithmetic. I want to speed up. Thanks for the help in advance. (I also...
Hi community My aim is to get into research about atoms, specifically, I want to do experimental research that explores questions like: 1. Why do Gallium/Mercury have low melting points 2. Why are there so many exceptions and inconsistencies when it comes to explaining molecular structures / reaction mechanisms in inorganic and organic chemistry 3. Experimental research about fundamental Quantum Mechanics, such as the one being followed by Hiroshima university that proved that observing...
guys i am currently studying in computer science engineering [1st yr]. i was intrested in physics when i was in high school. due to some circumstances i chose computer science engineering degree. so i want to incoporate computer science engineering with physics and i came across computational physics. i am intrested studying it but i dont know where to start. can you guys reccomend me some yt channels or some free courses or some other way to learn the computational physics.

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top