Tool for measuring inner dimensions of a tube from an offset position

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around measuring the offset of a rod within a vertically hanging glass tube, accessible only through a smaller opening. A proposed method involves using an elbow brace taped to the rod with a flexible material to gauge contact with the tube's inner wall, indicating the offset. However, there are questions about the visibility of a mark on the rod's top, which could aid in measuring its position relative to the tube. Participants express uncertainty about the effectiveness of the proposed method and suggest that there might be more precise tools available for this measurement. The conversation highlights the need for innovative solutions to accurately assess the rod's alignment within the constraints of the setup.
swooshfactory
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm trying to measure how far a rod that passes through a tube is offset from the center. Assume that the axis of the tube runs parallel to that of the rod. I can only access the interior of the tube from above (it hangs vertically), and the access hole I have is smaller than the radius of the tube. The tube is glass, and can survive moderate amounts of contact.

I have a primitive idea, where I tape an elbow brace to a rod, with a flexible material on top of the brace and at a right angle to the rod. When I place this setup into the tube, I can spin the rod and wait and see at what length of material the material makes contact with the inner wall of the tube. This would tell me the closest point to the offset axis.

This would work, and to fair accuracy if I'm careful about placing the material flush against the rod, but there must be a tool for this, or a better way.

Ideas welcome...
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
swooshfactory said:
Hi,

I'm trying to measure how far a rod that passes through a tube is offset from the center. Assume that the axis of the tube runs parallel to that of the rod. I can only access the interior of the tube from above (it hangs vertically), and the access hole I have is smaller than the radius of the tube. The tube is glass, and can survive moderate amounts of contact.

I have a primitive idea, where I tape an elbow brace to a rod, with a flexible material on top of the brace and at a right angle to the rod. When I place this setup into the tube, I can spin the rod and wait and see at what length of material the material makes contact with the inner wall of the tube. This would tell me the closest point to the offset axis.

This would work, and to fair accuracy if I'm careful about placing the material flush against the rod, but there must be a tool for this, or a better way.

Ideas welcome...

I'm not sure that I'm visualizing the setup correctly, but if you had a mark on the center of the top of the rod, would that mark always be visible through your inspection hole?
 
The very top of the rod would be sticking out the top of the tube, not inside of the tube.
 
swooshfactory said:
The very top of the rod would be sticking out the top of the tube, not inside of the tube.

So if it sticks out of the tube, why is it hard to measure it's position relative to the tube?
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Back
Top