Torn Between Studies: Physics & Nanotech/Aerospace

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kevin_Axion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Studies
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the appeal and challenges of pursuing Theoretical Physics versus Nanotechnology/Aerospace Engineering. The fascination with Theoretical Physics stems from its mathematical elegance and concepts like Quantum Gravity and Particle Physics, but concerns about job prospects in this field deter interest. In contrast, Nanotechnology/Aerospace Engineering is viewed as a more practical choice, offering better employment opportunities and financial stability while still maintaining a level of complexity and sophistication similar to Theoretical Physics. Suggestions include considering a double major or pursuing an undergraduate degree in Physics to keep options open for graduate studies in either field, with specific programs like Nanoengineering available at institutions such as the University of Toronto and University of Waterloo.
Kevin_Axion
Messages
912
Reaction score
3
There are two fields of study that have amazed me by their intriguing complexity and potential for the future. These are Theoretical Physics and Nanotechnology/Aerospace Engineering. I've loved Theoretical Physics because of the Mathematical Elegance and simplicity of ideas. My fascination in Theoretical Physics is mostly in Quantum Gravity, Particle Physics and Condensed Matter Physics. My reluctance to enter Physics in University is derived by how difficult it is for Physics Undergraduates and possibly graduates to find a Employment, even if I do find employment I won't be doing research or working in what I'm interested in. Nanotechnology/Aerospace Engineering on the other hand is the closest field to Theoretical Physics and it is a becoming applicable to the world and hence their is great demand for these researchers and Engineers. I'm driven to Theoretical Physics because of my fascination but Nanotechnology/Aerospace Engineering provides similar sophistication and unique ideas and includes better employment, opportunities, and ability to sustain myself financially. I would love to hear your thoughts on my perception so that I can make my decision and will be satisfied with it.

Thanks, Kevin
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Double major?
2) Perhaps it's not an issue, because "nanotech engineering" is not offered at my school, I've never actually heard of it as a specific undergraduate engineering degree, so perhaps it's a more prominent graduate degree? In which case, you could do your undergrad in physics, and at that point choose whether you want to study theoretical physics or nanotech engineering (I'm sure a physics undergrad degree will give you better ground to choose between the two).
 
Actually the University of Toronto and University of Waterloo both have Nanoengineering as an undergraduate: http://nano.uoftengineering.com/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top