Torque and Rotational Kinematics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving a grindstone coming to rest due to applied force and friction. The key equations include torque (τ), moment of inertia (I), and angular acceleration (α). The user attempts to derive the coefficient of kinetic friction (μk) but confuses the forces acting on the grindstone, particularly the torque produced by friction versus the applied force. Clarification is provided that the torque causing deceleration is due to friction, not the normal force applied. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying forces and their contributions to the system's motion.
zbobet2012
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A grindstone in the shape of a solid disk with diameter 0.490 m and a mass of m = 50.0 kg is rotating at omega = 890 rev/min. You press an ax against the rim with a normal force of F = 170 N, and the grindstone comes to rest in 7.20 s.

Homework Equations



τ=Iα
ωz0zkαt
τ=r×F

The Attempt at a Solution


\tau =I\alpha

{\omega }_z={\omega }_{0z}+{\mu }_k\alpha t

I=\frac{1}{2}MR^2

\tau =\frac{1}{2}MR^2\alpha

{\omega }_z=0\alpha =\ \frac{{\omega }_{0z}}{{\mu }_kt}

\tau =-\frac{1}{2}Mr^2\frac{{\omega }_{0z}}{{\mu }_kt}

\tau =r\times F

r\times F=\frac{1}{2}Mr^2\frac{{\omega }_{0z}}{{\mu }_kt}

{\mu }_k=\frac{Mr{\omega }_{0z}}{2tF}

F=f{\mu }_k

{\mu }_k=\frac{Mr{\omega }_{0z}}{2tf{\mu }_k}

{\mu }^2_k=\frac{Mr{\omega }_{0z}}{2tf}

{\mu }_k=\sqrt{\frac{Mr{\omega }_{0z}}{2tf}}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, although not provided in the question, I am assuming that you are supposed to find coefficient of kintic friction. (Your attempt at the solution tells me that.)
You erred in this statement:
zbobet2012 said:
\tau =r\times F

r\times F=\frac{1}{2}Mr^2\frac{{\omega }_{0z}}{{\mu }_kt}

Note that, torque produced by F is not the one which is producing deceleration in the disc (It is in a perpendicular direction to ωz!), rather it is f, torque due to friction which is producing deceleration. Keep this in mind and I hope you would be able to solve it, as you know other things, it seems.
 
F=f{\mu }_k <---isn't that the force due to friction? Or am I confused? Realizing I kind of messed up my notation, f = 170N and F_{friction}=F
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top