Torque applied on a lighting column

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the torque applied to a lighting column due to wind load and additional structures attached to it, such as an arm and a lighting armature. Participants explore the physics involved in determining the torque in both vertical and horizontal configurations, addressing the implications of added weights and lengths on the overall torque calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents initial calculations for torque using the formula T = ½ ⋅L⋅M⋅g, questioning the validity of their approach.
  • Another participant clarifies that if the column is vertical, the torque due to the weight of the column itself may not be applicable as the action line of the weight goes through the base.
  • Participants discuss how to calculate the combined torque when an arm is added to the column, suggesting that the torque from the wind load and the torque from the arm should be added together.
  • Further questions arise regarding how to incorporate the torque from an additional lighting armature attached to the arm, with multiple proposed methods for calculating the new torque.
  • One participant expresses confusion over the calculations and seeks clarification on whether to combine the lengths and masses or calculate them separately.
  • Visual aids are suggested to better illustrate the forces and torques acting on the system.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to calculate the torque from both the wind load and the additional arm, but there is no consensus on the best method to incorporate the lighting armature's torque into the overall calculations. Multiple competing views remain regarding the approach to take for the armature's contribution.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the assumptions underlying their calculations, particularly regarding the vertical position of the column and the application of forces at different points. There are unresolved questions about the effects of combining different lengths and masses in the torque calculations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in structural engineering, physics of forces and torques, or those working on similar projects involving load calculations on vertical structures.

aon3t
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Greetings!

I am currently making a program which is about lighting columns. And I am currently at a halt because I need some basic physics done before I can complete it.

I have a lighting column which is
L = 8 m
D = 0.087 m
M = 69 kg

I have a force, applied from the wind load, at
F = 1235 N

Now I need to find the torque applied on the whole column. I have used this formula earlier
T = ½ ⋅L⋅M⋅g (where I've used F = mg)

This have given me T = 4944 Nm.

I just need a validation if these calculations are correct.

Because my real problems starts now:

I want to add an arm to the top of the lighting column with these data

L = 3m
M = 36 kgs
D = 0.120m

And I wonder what the combined torque applied to the column is now?

The arm will be at a 90° angle outwards from the column like this → Γ

Later on I want to add a lighting armature to the arm and do the same calculations (but that won't be a problem when I understand how the arm affects the column).

English is not my first language, so bear with me if I am unclear, or not using the correct terms.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Hello aon, :welcome:

Just for clarification: is the column in a vertical position ? If so, there is no torque ½ ⋅L⋅M⋅g (action line of mg goes through base of column).

With the arm (if it's horizontal) you can add T = ½ ⋅Larm⋅Marm⋅g to the wind torque T = ½ ⋅Lcolumn⋅Fwind

Not that at the top of the column the arm exerts this same torque T = ½ ⋅Larm⋅Marm⋅g
 
BvU said:
Hello aon, :welcome:

Just for clarification: is the column in a vertical position ? If so, there is no torque ½ ⋅L⋅M⋅g (action line of mg goes through base of column).

With the arm (if it's horizontal) you can add T = ½ ⋅Larm⋅Marm⋅g to the wind torque T = ½ ⋅Lcolumn⋅Fwind

Not that at the top of the column the arm exerts this same torque T = ½ ⋅Larm⋅Marm⋅g

Thank you very much. This is currently how I've done it (I used the winload "Fwind" instead of Mg on the column just as you wrote). And yes, the column was in a vertical position.

So if I understand it right: I find the wind torque, and add this to the torque applied by the arm (which, as you said, applies the same torque to the top of the column)?

And one more question:

If I now want to add a lighting armature to this arm. Which have the following data:

L = 0.758m
M = 12 kg

Which is the best way to find the new Tarm?

a) Just add the mass and length to the arm (seeing it as a bit wider and heavier arm than before) and use the same formula as earlier?
b) Find the torque separately and add them? (this gives me a lower torque than the suggestion above)
c) Find the Farmature=mg of the armature and just add this to the torque formula? (Idea is that then the whole force of the armature is applied to the tip of the arm)

I have the 3 examples (g ≈ 9.81):

a) T = ½ ⋅(Larm+Larmature)⋅(Marm+Marmature)⋅g = ½⋅(3+0.758)⋅(19+12)⋅9.81 = 571.42 Nm

b) Tarmature = ½ ⋅L⋅M⋅g = ½⋅0.758⋅12⋅9.81 = 44.61 Nm
Tarm = ½ ⋅L⋅M⋅g = ½⋅3⋅19⋅9.81 = 279.6 Nm
T = Tarmature + Tarm = 44.61 + 279.6 = 324.21 Nmc) T = ½⋅Larm⋅(Marm+Farmature)⋅g = 456 Nm
 
Picture is worth ...

upload_2017-2-20_16-4-24.png


So far I have (at O, the base)
Fwind * 4 m ,
marm g * 1.5 m
marmature g * (3 + 1/2 * 0.758) m

At the top, only the latter two​
 
Thank you! Now I have all I need, I shall write a thanks to you when I hand in my paper for the program.

I had my eyes on how you solved the Tarmature, but I disregarded it because I found the T to be a bit smaller than expected, but that was because I forgot to add it to the Tarm.

Thanks a lot!
 
You're welcome. Good luck with the program.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
25K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K