Torque equilibrium. Where would the masses need to be placed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnball123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a torque equilibrium problem involving a triple beam balance. A 253 g mass is placed 1 cm from the pivot, while three smaller masses (1 g, 10 g, and 50 g) can be positioned between 0 cm and 10 cm from the pivot. Participants suggest that the equation should reflect distances from the pivot rather than from each other, and emphasize the importance of using consistent units. Iterative methods are proposed for finding the correct placement of the smaller masses, with one solution involving consecutive integers. The problem can be simplified by balancing the torques without needing to convert units, making it accessible even for those less familiar with advanced mathematics.
johnball123
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Warning: Posting template must be used for homework questions.
A triple beam balance, like the scales we use every week in lab, works using rotational equilibrium. If a 253 g mass is placed on the pan, 1 cm from the pivot, and there are three masses, 1 g, 10 g, and 50 g masses on the other side can be slid back and forth between 0 cm and 10 cm from the pivot, where would the masses need to be placed? Full credit only if you provide values at whole-integers of centimeters for the three masses.

So far I've got: .253-.05r-.01(r+x)-.001(r+x+y)=0

but I can't figure out how to solve for all the variables. any help is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you included the entire problem statement?
Your equation implies that maybe you haven't. You want your variables to be distance from the pivot, not from the previous mass, In your eqn 'x' is the distance from the 50g mass to the 10g mass, which isn't really relevant. So instead of your eqn:

0.253 -.005r - 0.01x - 0.001y = 0, where 0 ≤ r,x,y ≤ 10 and integers

This can be solved by iteration pretty quickly. There is one solution where they are three consecutive integers...

Or are you expected to be more mathematically rigorous?
 
This is the whole problem statement. I apologize, I'm not sure what iteration is. I'm a liberal arts major out of my comfort zone, taking a college algebra-based physics course.
 
Since you'll be comparing moments about a pivot, so long as all the units are the same (grams for mass, cm for distances) you won't need to convert to kg and meters. Just write the sum of the torques for each side of the pivot as an equation. Place the torque for the 253 gram mass on one side of the equals and the sum of the other torques on the other side. You really don't even need to convert the masses to weights since that's just multiplying every mass on both sides by a constant (g), and thus they all cancel out.

The problem can then be solved quite easily by inspection.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top