Torque, force and rotational acceleration

AI Thread Summary
When moving a mass from distance d to 2d on a massless ruler, the force required to maintain stability depends on the rotational inertia. The initial confusion arises from the relationship between torque and distance, where torque is calculated as the product of distance and force. While the force due to gravity remains constant, the rotational inertia increases with the square of the distance, leading to a requirement for quadrupling the force to maintain stability. The discussion highlights the distinction between static and dynamic scenarios, suggesting different calculations may apply based on the system's state. Understanding these principles clarifies the mechanics involved in maintaining equilibrium with changing distances.
The_Journey
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
This isn't a homework question.

I'm really confused at this, say you're holding a massless ruler / stick and there is a mass (m) on it at a distance d from your hand. If you move the mass to 2d from your hand, would you have to apply twice the force as before, or quadruple to keep it stable?

I know torque = r cross F. F is constant (mg), so the force you would have to apply should be twice if you move it to 2d. But my teacher said it is quadruple because the rotational inertia of the stick would be m(2d)^2 which is 4 times the rotational inertia as before.

Can anybody explain to me if the force would have to be twice or 4 times as before?

Again NOT a homework problem, I just thought of this.

Some equations and math would be nice too.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nvm I'll just put this in the homework section.
 
NVM...you have two different situations, one static, one dynamic, hence two different answers...if you know the formula for rotational inertia you can work out that result using
v = wr
 
Naty1 said:
NVM...you have two different situations, one static, one dynamic, hence two different answers...if you know the formula for rotational inertia you can work out that result using
v = wr

Can you explain what you mean by static and dynamic? The stick is always stable.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top