Torque has been a difficult chapter

  • Thread starter Thread starter dan987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving torque problems related to a beam with weights representing machinery. The user initially struggles with calculating forces FA and FB while ensuring that the net external force and torque are zero. After setting up the torque equation and realizing a sign error in the torque of the board, the user corrects their calculations. Ultimately, they find the values for FB and FA, concluding with the correct force calculations. The exchange highlights the importance of careful attention to signs in torque equations.
dan987
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm currently working on two homework problems that are giving me a bit of trouble. Torque has been a difficult chapter for me. I'm going to worry about just this one for now:

Question 1:
Calculate FA and FB for the beam shown in Fig. 9-49. The downward forces represent the weights of machinery on the beam. Assume the beam is uniform and has a mass of 210 kg.

Fig. 9-49 shows:
http://grab.by/Byt

I know that the net external force must be zero: SUM of Forces = 0
I also know that the net external torque must be zero: SUM of Torque = 0

So I've set up my equation for Torque, where T is Torque:

T = Force x Distance from the Pivot

So if I make my pivot the point at FA, shouldn't I have:

0 = - T(4300N x 2.0M) - T(3100N x 6.0M) - T(2200N x 9.0M) + Tboard + TFB

Solving for the Torque of the Board:
Tboard = 210Kg * 9.8 m/s2 * 5M = 10290

Plugging in all the Torques, 10FB being 10 (distance from FA) x Force (FB)
0 = -8600 - 18600 - 19800 + 10290 + 10FB

When I solve for FB however, and plug that force back into the equation, I'm not getting zero. I'm lost as to where I'm going wrong.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


You missed the minus sign on T_board. The torque is in the same direction as the machinery loads torque. The plus or minus sign will bite you every time.
 


Okay, I see what I did there. So then:

57290 = 10FB
so 5729 = FBedit: I figured it out:
Then I just go to the other side and make the FB pivot at zero, so that:

0 = (2200 x 1M) + (3100 x 4M) + (4300 x 8M) + T_Board - 10FA
0 = 2200 + 12400 + 34400 + 10290 - 10FA
FA = 5929

Thanks for the help!
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top