Torque needed to mantain a disk rotating

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the motor torque required to maintain the rotation of two vertical disks, each with a diameter of 46 cm and a weight of 30 kg, at a speed of 300 RPM. The friction torque from three generic bearings is estimated at 0.5 Nm, leading to a total friction torque of 1.5 Nm. It is established that to maintain constant RPM, the motor must only overcome this friction. Additionally, the torque required for acceleration is defined by the formula: Tmotor = (Moment of Inertia * angular acceleration) + Tfriction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torque and rotational motion
  • Knowledge of moment of inertia calculations
  • Familiarity with angular acceleration concepts
  • Basic principles of friction in mechanical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the calculation of moment of inertia for cylindrical objects
  • Learn about angular acceleration and its impact on torque requirements
  • Explore the effects of friction in rotating systems, particularly in bearings
  • Study the principles of motor torque and power in mechanical applications
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, robotics enthusiasts, and anyone involved in designing or maintaining rotating machinery will benefit from this discussion.

Cuervo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello, first post!

I'd apreciate some help on finding out the calculus for knowing the motor's torque needed for mantaining 2 vertical disks ø46cm, 30kg each at 300rpm, taking into acount 3 generic bearings friction that hypotetically is 0.5Nm friction torque

I'm having some trouble trying to figure it out, cause I see that for starting it up needs much more torque than for maintaining it turning at that speed, anyways I can give it a hand and start it by giving it some push, but what I'm looking for now is for the late torque needed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
The torque needed to maintain the motion depends on the friction and other losses in the motion - alone.
Per your information, that would be 0.5Nm - which will be the kinetic friction perhaps.
Starting up you need to overcome the static friction, which is usually much higher.

IRL the friction will be speed dependent... so you start off with the torque to overcome static friction, which is more than enough to overcome kinetic friction so the disks accelerate ... but the kinetic friction increases with speed (though it may initially decrease as the lubricant warms up and gets less sticky) until it is equal to the applied torque and you maintain a constant speed from there.

That should help you understand what you are seeing... then you can look up the references for common models that may help you. What you actually use depends on the specifics of your requirements.

i.e.
Tedric A. Harris, Michael N. Kotzalas Essential Concepts of Bearing Technology, 5th Ed. ch10.5
(probably overkill - most people would use the steady-state number for NOC.)
 
Last edited:
I'd apreciate some help on finding out the calculus for knowing the motor's torque needed for mantaining 2 vertical disks ø46cm, 30kg each at 300rpm, taking into acount 3 generic bearings friction that hypotetically is 0.5Nm friction torque

If there was no friction then no torque (or power) would be required to maintain a constant rpm. To maintain a constant rpm the motor only has to overcome friction. Is that 0.5Nm per bearing? If so the answer to the question is just 3 * 0.5 = 1.5Nm.

The torque required to accelerate is:

Tmotor = (Moment of Inertia * angular acceleration) + Tfriction

So you need to work out the moment of inertia of your discs and the angular acceleration required (in Rads/S2).

Edit: Cross posted with Simon.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K