Torque on a sign driving down a road

  • Thread starter Thread starter fisselt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sign Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the torque experienced by a sign on a truck due to a crosswind. The sign's dimensions and surface area are provided, along with the wind speed and the necessary equations for determining force and torque. The user calculates the force exerted by the wind on the sign using the drag equation, resulting in a force of approximately 6904.788 Newtons. They then calculate the torque by multiplying this force by the average distance from the sign's center to its attachment point, yielding a torque of about 3595.32 Nm. The user also considers the impact of the second half of the sign, suggesting that it would experience reduced wind force and seeks confirmation on their calculations and descriptions.
fisselt
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A sign is on a truck traveling 55mp/h (88 km/h). There is a crosswind on the truck of 40 mp/h (64.37 km/h). What is the torque experienced by the sign from the crosswind?

The sign is actually 2 boxes sitting side by side with identical dimensions. Following dimensions are for just one piece of the sign. Dimension of the sign perpendicular to wind is 41"x96"x8". Surface area of sign perpendicular to wind is 3936 in^2 or 2.53934976 m^2. The volume of the sign is 54,528 (in^3) or 0.893553826 m^3.

Homework Equations


torque=r*F
P=1/2(density air)(v^2 wind)(drag coefficient)

The Attempt at a Solution


I know I need the force of air on the sign. I have discounted the second part of the sign for this since I don't see how it is relevant (especially since they are not attached in my picture from my teacher). For this I used P=1/2(density air)(v^2 wind)(drag coefficient). That is P=1/2(1.25kg/m^3)(64.37)^2(1.05)= 2719.17 N/m^2. So, that force times surface area 2.5393 m^2 is 6904.788 Newtons.

Having that Torque=r* 6904.788 N. Can I say r is the average distance from the force on the sign to the point at which it is attached to the truck? I have no such attachment in my drawing so I'll just say center of the sign. That is 20.5" or 0.5207 m.
So, Torque= .5207 m*6904.788 N. Which is 3595.32 Nm.

For the second half of the sign: It is a mirror copy of the other. It only has only whatever fraction of wind went around the first half that will hit it, maybe 30%.. and that would likely be at a reduced velocity. So, I would just add 30% to the final torque value. If I knew exactly how much force was left in the wind and what % of wind was hitting the second half I could get a good number here. Let me know if I need to make a drawing for this since I don't know if I'm describing it very well. Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So can someone say if I'm doing this correctly or was my description terrible?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Back
Top