Torque Calculation: Is Fr=I*alpha?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ahmed Abdullah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
AI Thread Summary
When a force F is applied to a door at a distance r from the hinge, it creates a torque equal to Fr, which causes the door to rotate with angular acceleration alpha. The relationship between torque, moment of inertia, and angular acceleration is expressed as torque = I * alpha. The discussion clarifies that while a single force is applied, the torque affects all mass elements of the door differently due to their varying distances from the axis of rotation. It is emphasized that applying the same force at different points alters the torque and, consequently, the angular acceleration, as more work is done when the force is applied further from the pivot. Ultimately, understanding the relationship between torque, work, and angular acceleration is crucial for grasping rotational dynamics.
Ahmed Abdullah
Messages
203
Reaction score
3
When a door is pushed at the edge with a force F, a torque is exerted on the door of magnitude Fr (r=level arm).
The torque compel the door to rotate at an angular acceleration alpha.
So the torque=(moment of inertia)*(angular acceleration).

Now the question is : is Fr=(moment of inertia)*(angular acceleration)?

I think it is incorrect for "torque=I*alpha" is derived by summing Fr of every single point mass over the whole body.

Your response will broaden my view toward physics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ahmed Abdullah said:
Now the question is : is Fr=(moment of inertia)*(angular acceleration)?
Assuming that the applied force F is the only force creating a torque on the door (frictionless hinges), then yes it is correct.

I think it is incorrect for "torque=I*alpha" is derived by summing Fr of every single point mass over the whole body.
I don't understand what you mean. There's only one force (F) and it is applied at a particular distance from the axis (r).

Perhaps you are thinking of the derivation of I, which is obtained by integrating R^2dm for every mass element in the body.
 
How only one force is attributed on every mass element in the body? Does a force acting on a particular point effect every other point in a same way? I mean does every point mass experience the same force F?
If they do then why torques vary when we exert the same force on different point along the length (r)?
 
Last edited:
Ahmed Abdullah said:
How only one force is attributed on every mass element in the body? Does a force acting on a particular point effect every other point in a same way? I mean does every point mass experience the same force F?
If they do then why torques vary when we exert the same force on different point along the length (r)?

have you carefully studied the derivation of moment of inertia and torque?
 
Ahmed Abdullah said:
How only one force is attributed on every mass element in the body? Does a force acting on a particular point effect every other point in a same way? I mean does every point mass experience the same force F?
Applying a force F to a point r does not mean you have applied that same force to all points--the torque is transmitted through the body, not the force. The force applies a single torque to the entire body, since it is applied at a single point. You can think of it as applying a torque to each mass point individually, and then adding up all the contributions--but that's been done for you by using the moment of inertia for the body.

Realize that the "point masses" that compose the body are connected by internal forces. (Just like if you push a block, the whole block accelerates even though you just pushed one side.)
If they do then why torques vary when we exert the same force on different point along the length (r)?
For rotational purposes, it's the torque that counts, not the force. If you apply the same force at different points it produces a different torque.
 
malawi_glenn said:
have you carefully studied the derivation of moment of inertia and torque?

You raised an important question. Probably I didn't. Thnx, now I should indulge myself on that ...
 
also Doc_Al's answer is very good, you must take account for that the "points" that the solid body conssist of is connected with forces (electromagnetic if we are talking of atoms)..
 
:rolleyes:
I have made some careful study and found out the followings.
When we push a block with a force of F. We exert the force at one point but the whole block accelerates. Each tiny mass of the block doesn't experience the force F but a small portion of it. If the block were composed of three mass element m1, m2 and m3, then F=m1a+m2a+m3a=a*(m1+m2+m3)=a*M

So when we push the door with a force F, the door moves. It means that each mass element have experienced a force but these forces are not equal. Because the linear accelerations (ai) vary for different points (F=ma, a is different so F must be different).
When the door begins to rotate with an angular acceleration of @ different points feel different forces according to their position. Let these forces on different point with masses m1,m2...mi situated at different perpendicular distance from the axis r1, r2...ri be F1, F2, ....Fi
So
F1=m1a1=m1@r1 (here @=angular acceleration)
F2=m2a2=m2@r2
.....
.....
Fi=miai=mi@ri


So SUMMATION of Firi= SUMMATION of @(miri^2)=@*SUMMATION of (miri^2)=@*(moment of inertia)

When a block accelerate linearly the exerted force F=(summation of forces experienced by every mass element).
So when the door rotates at @ angular acceleration: Is the exerted force
F=(summation of mi@ri)?
If the answer is yes then the point of exertion of force should have no value in determining the torque.
I am actually trying to understand how exertion of the same force on different point along the length alter the turning effect (here @). Torque=@*(moment of inertia) doesn't tell us anything about this. Torque=Fr tell us that torque is greater when the level arm is longer. But it is nothing more than a mathematical expression to me (so far).
I expect your answer to be less mathematical but more intuitional.
Thnx in advance.
 
Last edited:
Work done by torque=torque*(angle of rotation)
Work done by Force=Force*(displacment toward the direction of force)

So when we push a door at r with a force of magnitude F and an angular displacement of "theta" is observed. Here the force is always changing direction as to be parrallel to the displacement. Now the work done by the force is F*displacement=F*(theta)*r =work done by the torque

As we are exerting the force to a more far away point from the axis of rotation the displacement is higher for a given angle, so more work is done.
Since torque is something related with work, more torque is applied when more work is done.
Now I am wandering why there is more angular acceleration when we exert the same force to a more terminal point.
Suppose we have exerted two same force on two different point r1 and r2, where r2>r1.
So for a given angular displacement more work is done for the second case.
More work is done for the same displacement, when applied force is greater. In a simmilar way a greater torque and angular acceleration is involved when there is more work done for the same angular displacement.
I am still unable to convince myself that I understand why there is more angular acceleration when the applied force move to a more terminal point.
I think your response will help me (it always does).
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Ahmed Abdullah said:
As we are exerting the force to a more far away point from the axis of rotation the displacement is higher for a given angle, so more work is done...

I am still unable to convince myself that I understand why there is more angular acceleration when the applied force move to a more terminal point.
I think your response will help me (it always does).
You've convinced yourself that more work is done by applying a force at the larger radius (through some angular displacement). So, how does doing work on a rotating body relate to changing the body's rotational kinetic energy? How does a change in rotational kinetic energy relate to angular acceleration?
 
  • #11
Actually you are right.
For a given angular displacement "theta" from rest more work is done when the rotating object is given more kinetic energy. Rotational kinetic energy = 1/2*(moment of Inertia)*(angular velocity)^2

So to receive greater angular velocity from stationary position for fixed angle of theta , greater angular acceleration is required. That's why greater angular acceleration is involved with greater torque.
Now it is enough for me and I fully undrestand the concept of torque.
Thank you very much for all of your help. :-)
 
Back
Top