Torsion Spring Catapult Velocity

AI Thread Summary
To design a torsion spring catapult capable of launching a 0.15kg ball at 35 m/sec, the arm length is set at 0.3m from the center of the torsion coil, with an assumed launch angle of 45 degrees. The discussion seeks assistance in defining the specifications for the required torsion spring. The context suggests potential applications such as a pitching machine. Key factors to consider include the spring constant and torque needed to achieve the desired velocity. Accurate calculations will ensure effective performance of the catapult design.
marietta_ken
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to design a simple torsion spring catapult to launch a 0.15kg ball at a velocity of 35 m/sec at the moment of separation. The ball will be in direct contact with the unrestrained end of the spring. As a starting point, I'm planning a 0.3m length for that "arm" end of the spring as measured from the center of the torsion coil. I'm also starting with an assumption of 45 degrees of contact/throw for the arm.

Can anyone help me define the torsion spring I need?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
are you building a pitching machine?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top