Maximizing Projectile Distance with Torsion Spring Catapult

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the maximum distance a one-ounce projectile can be launched using a torsion spring catapult, specifically one resembling a mousetrap mechanism. Participants are exploring the relationship between force, distance, and angle in the context of projectile motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the sufficiency of the provided information, particularly regarding the force's behavior at different angles and the validity of the energy equation for variable forces. There is also discussion about how to calculate energy based on the arm's movement and the force values given in a table.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants clarifying details about the force measurements and their implications for energy calculations. Some guidance has been provided regarding the relationship between angle and force, but there remains uncertainty about the completeness of the data and how to apply it effectively.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the force at the end of the arm behaves differently at various angles, with a sudden drop-off in force below a certain angle. The discussion also highlights the need for clarity on whether the force values are indeed accurate and complete for the angles being tested.

Berwin
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Determine maximum distance an one ounce projectile can be launched with a torsion spring catapult.
6vtWp.png


Homework Equations


E = F * d = 1/2 * m * v02Note: Theta is the measurement of how far the lever arm is being pulled back.

Am I missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There does not appear to be enough information, in two ways.
There's no basis for figuring the distance through which the force acts. It doesn't say what the force is for smaller angles. It could be linear down to about 10 degrees, or it might suddenly drop to zero somewhere below 140.
But your equation E = F * d is only valid for constant forces, which this clearly is not. The more general form requires you to integrate F over the distance. If the force is a linear function of distance over the range of integration (which it looks to be from the table) then the result will be quadratic.
 
If it helps at all, the torsion spring in this case is one you find in a mousetrap. We've attached a plastic spoon to the lever arm of the mousetrap, which together reach 0.17145 meters. Does this make a difference?
 
Berwin said:
We've attached a plastic spoon to the lever arm of the mousetrap, which together reach 0.17145 meters.
That's useful info. So as the arm moves through angle dθ, the force advances rdθ, where r = 0.17145 m. That allows you to calculate the energy imparted as the angle changes.
However, just realized I should have checked something. The F values in the table really are the force at the end of the arm, yes? They're not torque (Nm)?
That leaves the question of whether the table is complete. I.e., as the angle falls below 140o, does the force suddenly vanish or does it continue to decline linearly?
 
Yes, it's just the force at the end of the arm. The force suddenly vanishes. We only wanted to test the angles given above in the chart.
 
Berwin said:
Yes, it's just the force at the end of the arm. The force suddenly vanishes. We only wanted to test the angles given above in the chart.
Ok, so do you understand how to compute the total energy from that chart (combined with knowledge of the length of the arm)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K