Total angular momentum operators

ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
606
Sometimes the concept of angular momentum is presented using the idea of total angular momentum J. In those cases, its always said that we have \vec{J}=\vec L + \vec S. But I can't understand how that's possible. Because orbital angular momentum operators are differential operators and so are infinite dimensional matrices while spin angular momentum operators are finite dimensional matrices.But matrices of different dimensions can't be added. So how is that possible? What is \vec J like?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Hilbert space of a particle with spin ##s## is really ##L^2(\mathbb R^3)\otimes \mathbb C^{2s+1}## and ##\vec{J} = \vec{L} + \vec{S}## is just an abbreviation for ##J_i = L_i\otimes\mathrm{id} + \mathrm{id}\otimes S_i##, where ##L_i = \epsilon_{ijk} x_j \partial_k## and ##S_i=\frac{\hbar}{2}\pi_s(\sigma_i)##, where ##\pi_s## is a representation of ##\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb C)## of dimension ##2s+1##. In case of spin ##s=\frac{1}{2}##, ##S_i = \frac{\hbar}{2}\sigma_i## and ##\sigma_i## are the Pauli matrices for example.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top