Total Kinetic Energy: Solving 72 kg Person Running at 12 km/h

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the total kinetic energy of a 72 kg person running at 12 km/h, considering both linear and rotational motion. Key points include the need to account for the rotational kinetic energy of the arms and legs, which are modeled as thin uniform bars. Participants highlight issues with significant figures, noting that the speed conversion from 12 km/h should yield 3.3 m/s instead of 3 m/s to maintain proper precision. The calculations provided yield different kinetic energy values, indicating confusion over the correct approach. Accurate consideration of both linear and rotational components, along with proper significant figures, is essential for solving the problem correctly.
mdewdude
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Biomedical measurements show that the arms and hands together typically make up 13.0 % of a person's mass, while the legs and feet together account for 37.0 %. For a rough (but reasonable) calculation, we can model the arms and legs as thin uniform bars pivoting about the shoulder and hip, respectively. Let us consider a 72.0 kg person having arms 65.0 cm long and legs 90.0 cm long. The person is running at 12.0 km/h, with his arms and legs each swinging through 30 decrees }. Assume that the arms and legs are kept straight.

What is the total kinetic energy due to both his forward motion and his rotation?

Homework Equations



0.5 m v^2 =KE

The Attempt at a Solution


This is for online hw. The problem is that no matter how i do the sig figs for this problem, i still get it wrong.

After converting the 12 km/h the proper sig figs indicated a m/s value of 3 m/s. by plugging that into the equation i get 72kg*9m/s *0.5=300j but if i do it like this 72 kg*3.333^2 *0.5=400 but the 300 j answer is wrong but the 400 j answer is wrong but due to sig figs or rounding. Can somebody help me and tell me what is wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two problems I see here.

1. You haven't included the kinetic energy due to rotation of the arms and legs.

2. "12 km/h" has two sig figs, so the conversion to m/s should also have two sig figs, i.e. 3.3 m/s, not 3 m/s. And the final answer would have two sig figs, since the mass "72 kg" also has two sig figs.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top