Total nuclear spin of deuteron

Demon117
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
Hello all, I am having trouble understanding how this works. In Krane there arises a discussion on total angular momentum I of the deuteron. While it is true it has three components, namely the individual spins of the neutron and proton, but also the orbital angular momentum l of the nucleons as they move about their common center of mass. This total angular momentum can be denoted by

I=s_{p} + s_{n} + l

He continues on to talk about the different ways to couple these contributions and states there are only four possibilities. I can see the first two possibilities for total angular momentum I=1, but the other two make no sense. These are the possibilities:

(1) s_{n} and s_{p} are parallel with l=0
(2) s_{n} and s_{p} are antiparallel with l=1
(3) s_{n} and s_{p} are parallel with l=1
(4) s_{n} and s_{p} are parallel with l=2

One can see why (1) and (2) hold by inspection but (3) and (4) make my brain hurt. Perhaps I am just not seeing the correct orientation. Any suggestions?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
matumich26, Do you know how to couple two angular momenta? You don't just add them. When you couple J1 to J2 the combined system can have any value of J in the range from their sum J1 + J2 to their difference |J1 - J2|. You must include all of these possibilities. For example when you coupled the two spins together, 1/2 ⊗ 1/2 = 1 ⊕ 0. That's the way we write it, and it means the coupled system can have either S = 1 (parallel) or S = 0 (antiparallel).

Ok, you wanted to look at the cases with S = 1. When you further couple S with L,

1 ⊗ 0 = 1
1 ⊗ 1 = 2 ⊕ 1 ⊕ 0
1 ⊗ 2 = 3 ⊕ 2 ⊕ 1

You can see in all three of these cases, I = 1 is one of the possibilities.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
414
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top