Total spin angular momentum meaning

galvin452
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Two questions

1) The total orbital spin angular momentum is given as L2=l(l+1). What is the source of or meaning of the (l+1).

2) Similarly for the electron the total spin angular momentum is given as S2-1/2(1/2+1) hbar2. Is the total angular momentum precessing to give sz 1/2 hbar object?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited:
galvin452 said:
Two questions
2) Similarly for the electron the total spin angular momentum is given as S2-1/2(1/2+1) hbar2. Is the total angular momentum precessing to give sz 1/2 hbar object?

Or is it that the electron has two intrinsic spin values?
 
galvin452 said:
1) The total orbital spin angular momentum is given as L2=l(l+1).

There's no such thing as "total orbital spin angular momentum."

Orbital angular momentum has magnitude ##L = \sqrt{l(l+1)} \hbar##, and its component along any direction (usually we use the z-direction) is ##L_z = m_l \hbar## where ##m_l = -l \cdots +l## in steps of 1.

Spin angular momentum has magnitude ##S = \sqrt{s(s+1)} \hbar##, and its component along any direction (usually we use the z-direction) is ##S_z = m_s \hbar## where ##m_s = -s \cdots +s## in steps of 1. For e.g. an electron, s = 1/2, so ms = -1/2 or +1/2.

Total angular momentum has magnitude ##J = \sqrt{j(j+1)} \hbar##, and its component along any direction (usually we use the z-direction) is ##J_z = m_j \hbar## where ##m_j = -j \cdots +j## in steps of 1.

(Some books use different notation.)

What is the source of or meaning of the (l+1).

For orbital angular momentum, one way to get the ##l(l+1)## is to apply the (orbital) angular momentum operator to the solutions to the Schrödinger equation for e.g. the hydrogen atom. There's probably a "deeper" way to get it which applies to all three kinds of angular momentum, but someone else will have to provide it.
 
No that's pretty much it - in QM classes (here anyway) we force students to do that calculation.
The quantum number basically comes from counting the states. There are three dimensions and the surd comes from the vector sum. You actually have to crunch through the equations to see it.

One may expect that the lth L state would have L=l\hbar ... but that neglects stuff like that there are three dimensions. The x(x+1) pattern is kind-of a symmetry in angular momentum.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...

Similar threads

Back
Top