Total, transitive, not anti-symmetric orderings

  • Thread starter Thread starter noowutah
  • Start date Start date
noowutah
Messages
56
Reaction score
3
I have a total order on a multi-dimensional, real-numbered vector space X. This means that for any vectors x,y\in{}X either xRy or yRx. Total orders are usually transitive, total, and antisymmetric (if xRy and yRx then x=y), but this one is not necessarily antisymmetric, it is only transitive and total. Which further conditions do I need to prove that it is antisymmetric, ie. xRy and yRx imply x=y just based on the fact that the ordering is total and transitive? One example of a transitive, total ordering which is not antisymmetric is one that uses only one coordinate of the vector and the usual less than (\geq) or greater than (\leq) relations: xRy if and only if x_{i}>y_{i} for some fixed i, and we ignore all other coordinates, all x_{j} for j\neq{}i. I have a hunch that ALL transitive, total orderings that are not antisymmetric are of this type. How could I formalize and prove this claim?

The claim, in other words, is that the only transitive, total, not-antisymmetric orderings R of a n-dimensional, real-numbered vector space are those which only consider one dimension and disregard the others. Let R be a such an ordering. Then there exists a transitive, total, antisymmetric ordering R' of the real numbers such that for a fixed k\in\{1,\ldots,n\} xRy if and only if x_{k}R'y_{k}. How would I prove this (and is it correct)?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Taking myself out of the NR category. Don't bother answering this one. The claim is patently false and needs to be re-articulated. Sorry.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
12K
Back
Top