Tracing back an electromagnetic wave to its source

AI Thread Summary
Tracing back an electromagnetic wave to its source requires more than just the electric and magnetic field vectors; boundary conditions and the context of the wave's propagation are crucial. Without specifying whether the fields are in a vacuum or a waveguide, and the nature of any boundaries, it is impossible to determine the originating charge or current system. If the fields are source-free, they inherently lack associated charges or currents. However, knowing the fields on a closed surface surrounding a source allows for the calculation of an equivalent multipole source. Thus, sufficient information about the environment and conditions is essential for tracing the source of an electromagnetic wave.
andresB
Messages
625
Reaction score
374
Suppose you have a solution to the Maxwell's equations in vacuum, and now you want to find what kind of charge/current system create the wave in the first place, can this be done?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
andresB said:
Suppose you have a solution to the Maxwell's equations in vacuum, and now you want to find what kind of charge/current system create the wave in the first place, can this be done?

You have not given sufficient information. All you've given is that the medium is a vacuum. You have not described the boundary conditions, and the relative size of the EM wavelengths to any confined space (i.e. if this is in a waveguide).

Zz.
 
I only have a vector function E and a vector function B that satisfy all the source-free Maxwell's equations.
 
And if that is not enough, then how much more information is required?
 
If it is source-free/vacuum then by definition there are no charges or currents.
 
andresB said:
And if that is not enough, then how much more information is required?

I've just told you! The nature of the boundary conditions! Are these E and B fields solved in a waveguide? In free space? And if there is a boundary, what kind of a boundary is it?

For example, if you are given a standing wave in a waveguide, then I don't see how you can have the ability to trace where the "source" is.

Zz.
 
If you know the fields everywhere on a closed surface that surrounds the source, then you can solve for an equivalent multipole source that produces the same fields as the real source.
 
Back
Top