Train Velocity Model for Distance of 5280 ft

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 428835
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Train
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the time it takes for a train to travel 5280 feet, using a piecewise-continuous velocity function. The function specifies a constant velocity of 80 fps after 15 seconds and a polynomial expression for earlier times. Participants highlight the need for additional equations to solve for the unknown coefficients b, c, and d in the polynomial. Concerns are raised about the integration process and the accuracy of the initial distance equation. The need for continuity and differentiability conditions at the transition point of the piecewise function is also emphasized.
member 428835

Homework Statement


A piecewise-continuous function models the velocity of a train (fps) as follows:
$$
v(t) =
\begin{cases}
80, & \text{if }\text{t>15} \\
bt+ct^2+dt^3, & \text{if }t\text{ <15}
\end{cases}
$$

How much time does it take the train to travel 5280 ft?

Homework Equations


$$(1) vdv=ads$$
$$(2) ds=vdt$$
$$(3) dv=adt$$

where s is distance, v is velocity, t is time, a is acceleration

The Attempt at a Solution


i have: 5280=80t+15^2b+15^3c+15^4d by integrating the piecewise function and using (2). it seems if i can find variables b,c,d i will be done.

i have 80=bt+ct^2+dt^3 from the continuity of the function (given)

by (3) i have 0=b+2*15c+3*15^2d

it seems if i can find one more equation for b,c,d i'll be done. i don't think i can use (1) as i do not have velocity as a function of distance. I've used the other two equations, so i feel i am close. any help is very appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equation 5280=... looks wrong. First, 80t is not the distance traveled after the first 15 seconds. Second, check the integration itself. Third, at that point you cannot know if the 5280 ft will be reached in the first 15 second or not.

i have ##80=bt+ct^2+dt^3## from the continuity of the function (given)
This is not the equation you have. Where (at which time!) are the functions equal?

Is the function piecewise-continuous (which does not help) or piecewise-continuous differentiable?
You could add the requirement that the second derivative is the same at both sides as well, but I don't see this requirement in the problem statement.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top