Trajectory: integrating for position

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the position of a projectile under the influence of gravity, specifically using Newton's second law. The original poster is attempting to integrate the equations of motion for a trajectory without air resistance, while also considering the implications of initial velocity and angles in the context of projectile motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration of forces to find position, questioning the role of initial velocity and angles. There is exploration of how to handle horizontal and vertical components separately, and some participants suggest using arbitrary angles when specifics are not provided.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on integrating the equations of motion and clarifying the roles of constants in the equations. There is a focus on ensuring the correct setup for both horizontal and vertical motion, and some participants are exploring how to eliminate time from the equations to express trajectory.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of comparing trajectories with and without air resistance, and the problem requires deriving equations based on initial conditions that are not fully specified. Participants are also navigating the implications of different launch angles and initial velocities.

  • #31
well, my c = vsin(theta)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Oblio said:
well, my c = vsin(theta)

exactly.

vy = -gt + vsin(theta)
y = (-1/2)gt^2 + (vsin(theta))t + D

do, the same type of thing for D using the position equation... at t = 0, y = 0...
 
  • #33
D=0... ?
 
  • #34
technically my equations were right weren't they? I just wasnt solving for t=0 yet.
 
  • #35
Oblio said:
D=0... ?

yes.

vy = -gt + vsin(theta)
y = (-1/2)gt^2 + (vsin(theta))t

now, we could have done this directly... use the equations for displacement with accleretated motion ie:

d = v0*t + (1/2)at^2

but since the question asked to integrate... we did it this way...

can you do the same type of thing in the x direction?

a_x = 0
 
  • #36
It's all necessary with no horizontal forces?
 
  • #37
0 = ma

C=v(x)
v(x) =vcos(theta), C=Vcos(theta)

y=v(x)t +D
y=D

at t=0, D=0 also.
 
  • #38
Oblio said:
0 = ma

C=v(x)
v(x) =vcos(theta), C=Vcos(theta)

y=v(x)t +D
y=D

at t=0, D=0 also.

Yes, so:

x = vcos(theta)t
y = vsin(theta)t - (1/2)gt^2

you can eliminate t from these two equations now.
 
  • #39
algebraically or through another situation such as (t=0) (not that one I realize though)
 
  • #40
Oblio said:
algebraically or through another situation such as (t=0) (not that one I realize though)

algebraically.
 
  • #41
set them equal?
 
  • #42
nope. lol
 
  • #43
Oblio said:
nope. lol

solve for t in one... substitute that into the other.
 
  • #44
ok, it asks for the trajectory as a function of x so:

y=vsin(theta)x/cos(theta) - (1/2)g x^2/v^2cos(theta)^2
 
  • #45
Oblio said:
ok, it asks for the trajectory as a function of x so:

y=vsin(theta)x/cos(theta) - (1/2)g x^2/v^2cos(theta)^2

there should be vcos(theta) in the denominator in the first term.
 
  • #46
I think that's right according to what I'm supposed to be comparing it too...
 
  • #47
learningphysics said:
there should be vcos(theta) in the denominator in the first term.

sorry.
had that in ink ( i promise!)
 
  • #48
Oblio said:
sorry.
had that in ink ( i promise!)

lol! I believe you. So the v's will cancel in that first term. you get xtan(theta)
 
  • #49
Yup!
 
  • #50
So now you have to get the path again, but this time with air resistance?
 
  • #51
I actually did that FIRST, thinking I was doing part a, but I actually did b.

I think this question is basically done, I can show you my other section maybe?
They do basically match.
 
  • #52
Oblio said:
I actually did that FIRST, thinking I was doing part a, but I actually did b.

I think this question is basically done, I can show you my other section maybe?
They do basically match.

Sure... go ahead and show it.
 
  • #53
y= (v_{yo} + v_{ter}x) / v_{xo} + v_{ter}\tau ln (1 - x / v_{xo}\tau)

I'll skip a simplification step unless its needed: Used taylor's series which allowed cancellations.

y=v_{yo}x / v_{xo} - x^2v_{ter}\tau / 2v_{xo}^{2}\tau^{2}
 
  • #54
as usual subscripts are superscripts...
 
  • #55
Oblio said:
y= (v_{yo} + v_{ter}x) / v_{xo} + v_{ter}\tau ln (1 - x / v_{xo}\tau)

I'll skip a simplification step unless its needed: Used taylor's series which allowed cancellations.

y=v_{yo}x / v_{xo} - x^2v_{ter}\tau / 2v_{xo}^{2}\tau^{2}

Not sure if that's right or not... what is \tau ? I don't know the answer... if you want I can try to work it out to see if I get the same thing...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
329
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K