When considering a small beam of null-geodesics in spacetime it is possible to define the solid angle spanned by two of the rays at the observer.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

At page 111 in "Gravitational Lenses" by P.Schneider et. al. they state with reference to Figure (b) that:

"The dependence of this distance on the 4-velocity of the observer, given

the events 8 and 0, is due to the phenomenon of aberration. In fact, one

infers from [Figure (b)] that, if ##k^\alpha## is any vector tangent to the ray ##SO## at ##O## and ##U^\rho##, ##\tilde{U}^\rho## are two 4-velocities at ##O## with corresponding solid angles ##d\Omega## and ##d\tilde{\Omega}##, then

$$ \frac{d \tilde{ \Omega} }{d \Omega} = \frac{(k_\rho U^\rho )^2}{(k_\rho \tilde{U}^\rho)^2}."$$

No further explanations are given, so I guess the relation above must somehow be easily inferred from Figure (b), however I can not see how.

How is the relation above inferred from the figure?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Transformation of solid angle

Loading...

Similar Threads - Transformation solid angle | Date |
---|---|

A E field transformation in Feynman II_26 | Mar 3, 2018 |

I Transforming to local inertial coordinates | Feb 22, 2018 |

A Inverse of infinitesimal Lorentz transformation | Feb 19, 2018 |

I What is the physical meaning of the Lorenz transformation? | Feb 10, 2018 |

Transformation of solid angle | Mar 17, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**