Transformation rules for vielbein and spin connection

Steve Rogers
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Derive the following transformation rules for vielbein and spin connection:

$$\delta e_a^\mu=(\lambda^\nu\partial_\nu e_a^\mu-e_a^\nu\partial_\nu\lambda^\mu)+\lambda_a^b e_b^\mu$$

$$\delta\omega_a^{bc}=\lambda^\mu\partial_\mu\omega_a^{bc}+(-e_a^\mu\partial_\mu\lambda^{bc}+\omega_a^{d[b}\lambda_d^{c]}+\lambda_a^d\omega_d^{bc})$$
Relevant Equations
$$[M_{ab},X_c]=X_{[a}\eta_{b]c}$$

$$[M_{ab},M^{cd}]=-\delta_{[a}^{[c}M_{b]}^{d]}=-\delta_a^c M_b^d+\delta_b^c M_a^d+\delta_a^d M_b^c-\delta_b^d M_a^c$$
I am taking a course on General Relativity. Recently, I was given the following homework assignment, which reads

> Derive the following transformation rules for vielbein and spin connection:

$$\delta e_a^\mu=(\lambda^\nu\partial_\nu e_a^\mu-e_a^\nu\partial_\nu\lambda^\mu)+\lambda_a^b e_b^\mu$$

$$\delta\omega_a^{bc}=\lambda^\mu\partial_\mu\omega_a^{bc}+(-e_a^\mu\partial_\mu\lambda^{bc}+\omega_a^{d[b}\lambda_d^{c]}+\lambda_a^d\omega_d^{bc})$$

I was instructed to use:
$$[M_{ab},X_c]=X_{[a}\eta_{b]c}$$
and
$$[M_{ab},M^{cd}]=-\delta_{[a}^{[c}M_{b]}^{d]}=-\delta_a^c M_b^d+\delta_b^c M_a^d+\delta_a^d M_b^c-\delta_b^d M_a^c.$$
Also, the professor told us to consider the covariant derivative
$$\nabla_a=e_a^\mu\partial_\mu+\frac{1}{2}\omega_a^{bc}M_{cb}$$
To be honest, I have no idea what these symbols are (after examining my GR lecture note carefully). And most frustratingly, even if I have taken a one-year course on differential geometry (mathematical rigor), I still know nothing about the covariant derivative above. What on Earth do these symbols stand for? Is there any standard textbook that can help a GR beginner like me? I came here for some advice, please. Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you. The chapter you mentioned does contain some information about vielbein, but to crack the problem, I need to find the variations of ##e_a^\mu## and ##\omega_a^{bc}##. This confuses me a lot because those ##\lambda##'s and partial derivatives in the formulas came out of nowhere.
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top