Medical Transfusion/marrow transplant for aids treatment

  • Thread starter Thread starter TeX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Treatment
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential application of blood cancer treatment methods to retroviral infections like HIV. Participants explore whether techniques such as radiation, blood transfusions, and bone marrow transplants could effectively eradicate HIV by removing infected immune cells. Concerns are raised about the presence of infected cells in tissues beyond the blood, which complicates treatment. The idea of using integrase inhibitors to prevent new viral DNA integration in transplanted cells is also mentioned. Some participants express optimism about emerging treatments, including enzymes that target infected cells and new drugs like D-peptides, suggesting that a combination of these approaches could lead to a cure for AIDS. However, there is skepticism about the feasibility of such procedures, particularly regarding the risks involved and the ethical considerations surrounding blood donation for HIV patients. The conversation highlights a need for further research and clarification on these potential treatment strategies.
TeX
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
If the problem of retroviral infection is, like for example HIV, viral DNA segment integration in human DNA of immune system cells, why cannot be the same or similar method as used in treatment of patients with leukemia or blood cancers be applied here? What is preventing this? Couldn't infected immune system cells be destroyed with radiation and a new transfusion of blood and bone marrow transplant from donor? Couldn't be remaining viruses and infected immune system cells in blood be externally separated (filtered/collected - something like in kidney failure paitents)? Wouldn't such procedures eradicate the virus and remove infected immune system cells? The new healthy ones from donor would then in absence of viruses repopulate the patient. It would be risky, given the low immunity of such patient, but if blood cancer patients can survive such procedures, why couldn't this be helpful for aids patients? Wouldn't surgical removal of lymph nodes and spleen, combined with radiation, blood transfusion and bone marrow transplant eradicate hiv and cure aids?

..so, why is such procedure not working here (the analogy with blood cancer treatment)? Is it because infected immune system cells are not limited only to blood and are present in hard tissues too? Even if viruses could not be separated from blood but only infected immune system cells could, wouldn't new integrase inhibition drugs prevent integration of new retroviral DNA segments in newly received healthy immune system cells from donor?

..thanks to anyone for clarification of this topic.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I have been thinking of this kind of procedure for over a year now. I came to a conclusion that it can be done. There is no reason why a blood transfusion can't get rid of infected cells and replaced them or some with new ones by the donar's blood. The whole process would be a mess. No one wants to waste blood for HIV or AIDS patients because we tend to say that they don't deserve it or other patiens might need it more. Therefore, we lean towards drugs that prohibit the virus entering into the cells. But, recently I have heard of this Enzyme that actually finds the infected cells and cuts out the embeded DNA. If that is true, then the new drug D-peptides which mounts to the virus's GP41 or GP120 along with this enzyme should be enought to almost cure a patient. In addition, if a blood transfusion is done along with these new treatments I think a cure for AIDS is somthing that patients can look forward to.
 
TeX said:
if blood cancer patients can survive such procedures,

This is not a completely valid assertion. If you are interested in this subject, please Google leukemia-lymphoma society, American Cancer Society, Johns Hopkins, Cleveland Clinic, Mayo Clinic, NIH.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top