Transitional state of electrons.

  • Thread starter Thread starter airkapp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrons State
AI Thread Summary
An electron transition from n=3 to n=1 in a rigid box emits a 240 nm photon, leading to a calculated energy of 1.33E-19 J. The width of the box is derived using the formula L = √(h² / (8mE)), resulting in an approximate width of 1.08E-10 m, or 108 picometers. Corrections were noted regarding the inclusion of factors in the momentum and energy equations. The calculation assumes a one-dimensional box, and variations in dimensions would alter the result. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurate formulas in quantum mechanics for determining physical properties.
airkapp
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
This is how I went about it but I am unsure if it is correct..
An n=3 to n=1 transition from an electron trapped in a rigid box produces a 240 nm photon. What is the width of the box?


λ = hc / E:

E = hc / λ

E = (1.06E-34 J*s * 3E8m/s) / 240nm

= 1.33E-19 J

E = h2 / 8mL2

L2 = h2 / 8mE
L = √ h2 / 8mE

L = √ ((1.06E-34 J*s) 2 / (8*9.11E-31kg*1.33E-19 J))

= 1.08E-10 m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
airkapp said:
This is how I went about it but I am unsure if it is correct..
An n=3 to n=1 transition from an electron trapped in a rigid box produces a 240 nm photon. What is the width of the box?
You are missing a factor of 8:

Allowed values of electron momentum are:

p = \frac{hn}{2L}

Since E = p^2/2m, the allowed energy values are:

E = \frac{n^2h^2}{4L^2}\frac{1}{2m} =n^2\frac{h^2}{8mL^2}

The change in energy between n=3 and n=1 results in the photon (E=hv):

\Delta E = (9-1)\frac{h^2}{8mL^2} = \frac{hc}{\lambda}

L^2 = 8\frac{h\lambda}{8cm}

L = \sqrt{\frac{h\lambda}{cm}}

AM
 


Therefore, the width of the box is approximately 108 picometers. This calculation assumes a one-dimensional box, as the question does not specify the dimensions of the box. If the box is two or three-dimensional, the calculation would change accordingly.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top