MHB Transitivity as property of relation

roni1
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
In Hebrew, one explain to me that:
"Transitivity is a property (or attribute - I don't which word is correct) of property".
So,
(1) Which word is correct?
(2) Why Transitivity is not standalone by itself?
(3) Are there relations of other kind, that no standalone by themselves?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
roni said:
(1) Which word is correct?
Either "property" or "attribute" can be used. These words are used in their usual sense from the dictionary, not in a technical sense. The second occurrence of "property", though, is probably used in a technical sense.

From the mathematical standpoint, a property, or predicate, on a set $A$ is any subset of $A$. Alternatively, a predicate on $A$ can be defined as a function from $A$ to the set {true, false}. The the subsets consists of those elements of $A$ that are mapped to true.

A binary relation on a set $A$ is any subset of $A\times A$, a Cartesian product of $A$ and $A$, which is a set of all ordered pairs of elements of $A$. Thus, a binary relation is a property of ordered pairs, or a predicate on $A\times A$. Binary relations can be transitive or not. Thus, "transitivity" is a property of a binary relation, i.e., something that can be true or not about this relation.

roni said:
(2) Why Transitivity is not standalone by itself?
Any adjective, like "transitive", requires a noun in mathematics just like in everyday language.

roni said:
(3) Are there relations of other kind, that no standalone by themselves?
An adjective "continuous" is a property of functions in calculus, so to talk about continuity you must apply it to some functions.
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
35
Views
4K
Back
Top