Translating Quantified Statements Into English

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bashyboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    English
Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Translate these statements into English, where C(x) is “x is a comedian” and F(x) is “x is funny” and the domain consists of all people.

a) ∀x(C(x)→F(x))

b)∀x(C(x)∧F(x))

c) ∃x(C(x)→F(x))

d)∃x(C(x)∧F(x))


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Here are my answers:

For a): For every person, if they are a comedian, then they are funny.

For b): For every person, they are both a comedian and funny.

For c): There exists a person who, if he is funny, is a comedian

For d): There exists a person who is funny and is a comedian.

Here are the books answers:

a)Every comedian is funny.
b)Every person is a funny comedian.
c)There exists a person such that if she or he is a comedian, then she or he is funny.
d)Some comedians are funny.


Does the meaning of my answers seem to be in harmony with the meaning of the answers given in the solution manual?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The reason I ask is because part a), for instance, is a implication, and "Every comedian is funny," does not appear to be an implication.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top