Transverse Wave speed and acceleration

ironlee
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A Transverse wave on a string is described by this function :

y=.25(meters) sin[\frac{\pi(4)}{8} + \pi4t]

a.) Find the speed of the wave at t= 2sec

b.) Find the acceleration at t= 2sec

Homework Equations



y=.25 sin[\frac{\pi(4)}{8} + 4\pit]

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried taking the derivative with respect to t, but man I can't figure it out for the love of god and I have no idea what I'm doing wrong. I doubted myself so much I don't even know if I need to take the derivative.

P.S. at the end of the equation its 4 * pi * t (not 4 to the power of Pi) and its .25 meters
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure you meant to write

0.25 \sin{\left(\frac{4\pi}{8}+4\pi t\right)}

because there isn't any spatial coordinate in that wave function.

Either way, for a transverse wave, the argument of the function is constant, so

\frac{d}{dt}\left(kx-\omega t\right)=k\frac{dx}{dt}-\omega=\frac{d}{dt}C=0

where k is the wave number and \omega is the angular frequency. Therefore the velocity is \frac{dx}{dt}=\frac{\omega}{k}
 
Thank you so much! That'll be it, makes sense and yeah, that is what I meant to write. My problem was I couldn't remember which were constant. Thanks again!
 
Oh ok, great, I thought that's what you meant. Glad to help.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top