Transverse waves mechanics in a rope

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the mechanics of transverse waves in a rope, particularly how a wave pulse propagates after a flick is applied. It references Crowell's textbook, which models the rope as a series of masses connected by springs, emphasizing the forces and accelerations involved in the wave motion. When a flick is made, the initial bend in the rope creates a wave shape, but questions arise about how particles beyond the crest experience upward forces necessary for wave propagation. The mechanics of this upward force, despite the downward forces acting on the crest, are central to the inquiry. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for grasping how transverse waves travel through a medium like a rope.
Mårten
Messages
126
Reaction score
1
This thread is a continuation of another thread where the mechanics of water waves were discussed - see: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=274210

I'm trying to understand the detailed mechanics of a transverse wave in a rope. I base my ideas here on Crowell's textbook (see http://www.lightandmatter.com/html_books/3vw/ch03/ch03.html#Subsection3.2.1" ), where you see the rope as a series of masses connected with springs. The parts on the rope which have a bend is exposed to a force, and therefore an acceleration occurs there.

Now I make a flick in the end of the rope, sending only one pulse through the rope. (Actually, it works better and you see better what happens if you use a scarf lying on the floor instead.) So why is the wave pulse propagating?

Let's look at this flick movement in slow motion: When my hand is in the top position of the flick, the rope (or the scarf) lies bended, almost in a e^-x shaped curve (maybe not exactly, but sort of); it's bended like that due to gravity and the loose tension in the rope. In this curve of the rope, I cannot see that any forces act upwards on the particles. So, when my hand goes down again in the flick, some parts of the rope some inches from my hand, don't manage to go down as fast as my hand does, so there is a crest and a sine-like curve from my hand to the crest (i.e. like that part of the sine-curve that lies between phi=0..Pi/2). This means that there are forces acting diagonally downwards on that part of the rope that lies in between my hand and that crest. But on the top of the crest, the force is just downwards, and further away on the rope, there cannot be any forces yet except for gravity.

So how come that the parts of the rope that is beyond this crest receives an upward force? Cause there must be this upward force, otherwise the wave wouldn't propagate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone who can answer this? How could a wave propagate through a rope, i.e., what makes particles on a rope beyond the wave crest, go upwards?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top