Well, you can't reflect a photon of any known matter without destroying the original photon (and creating a new one in its stead). And since it has no electrical charge, you can't affect it with an EM field either. In theory, it should be possible to produce a gravitational field strong enough to get a photon to orbit around the source, but you'll probably get a black hole in the process... unless you're willing to compromise for a very large orbit radius...
Is it possible to trap a single photon? If yes, at what cost?
As is often the case in many questions involving SR and/or QM, the question becomes ambiguous if one doesn't define it clearly. This is due to certain classical connotations associated with the properties being asked.
If by asking
"is it possible to trap a single photon?"
one means
"can we store the info such as phase, energy, and coherence" of a number of photons for a period of time, and then retransmit those info without any significant loss?"
then the answer is YES. The report from a few years ago by the Lena Hau group at Harvard demonstrated this.[1] Here, they managed to halt the "speed" of light to 0 m/s in an atomic cloud medium.
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles.
Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated...
Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/
by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
I don't know why the electrons in atoms are considered in the orbitals while they could be in sates which are superpositions of these orbitals? If electrons are in the superposition of these orbitals their energy expectation value is also constant, and the atom seems to be stable!