Traveling Wave Model: transverse wave on a string

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a problem involving a transverse wave on a string, specifically calculating the transverse speed, acceleration, wavelength, period, and speed of propagation. The wave function provided is y=(0.120m)sin(π/8 x + 4πt), and the participant successfully determined the transverse speed as -1.51 and acceleration as 0 at t=0.200s for x=1.60m. There was confusion regarding the wavelength calculation, with the participant initially using an incorrect formula. Clarification was provided that the correct relationship is λ = 2π/k, leading to the correct wavelength of 16m, resolving the participant's misunderstanding. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurately solving wave problems.
mickellowery
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A transverse wave on a string is described by the wave function: y=(0.120m)sin(\frac{\Pi}{8}x+4\Pit) Determine the transverse speed and acceleration of the string at t=0.200s for the point on the string located at x=1.60m. What are the wavelength, period, and speed of propagation of this wave?


Homework Equations


vy= -\omegaAcos(kx-\omegat)
Since f=\frac{1}{T} and \omega is 4\Pi does that mean T=0.500?


The Attempt at a Solution


I was able to come up with -1.51 for the transverse speed, and I am pretty sure I understand why the acceleration is 0. I am having problems coming up with the wavelength and the proagation speed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mickellowery said:
Since f=\frac{1}{T} and \omega is 4\Pi does that mean T=0.500?
Yes.

I am having problems coming up with the wavelength and the proagation speed.
Hint: How does k relate to the wavelength?
 
Hi Doc,

I had tried \lambda= \frac{k}{2\Pi} with k=frac{\Pi}{8} and it didn't work out to the right answer.
 
What wavelength did you get?
 
I got .0625m and the book says it should be 16m
 
mickellowery said:
Hi Doc,

I had tried \lambda= \frac{k}{2\Pi} with k=frac{\Pi}{8} and it didn't work out to the right answer.
That should be k ≡ 2π/λ.
 
So how does that change the relationship between k and \lambda? I couldn't write it as \lambda= \frac{k}{2\Pi}?
 
mickellowery said:
So how does that change the relationship between k and \lambda? I couldn't write it as \lambda= \frac{k}{2\Pi}?
No. If k = 2\pi / \lambda, then \lambda = 2\pi / k. (Just algebraic manipulation--but make sure you understand it.)
 
Oh alright I've got it now. It's those silly little math mistakes that get me every time. Thanks much Doc.
 
Back
Top