Traveling Waveguide Explained: Constant vs. Gradient & Coupled Resonant Cavities

  • Thread starter Thread starter CL39
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Waveguide
AI Thread Summary
In traveling waveguides, a constant aperture diameter results in "constant impedance," leading to electric field attenuation as the wave propagates. Conversely, a tapered aperture, or "constant gradient," helps maintain a consistent electric field throughout the guide. Each segment of the waveguide, separated by conducting discs, forms "coupled resonant cavities," indicating they are interconnected. Losses inherent in waveguides cause signal attenuation, meaning the output signal has less power than the input. Understanding these principles is crucial for optimizing waveguide performance.
CL39
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
For traveling waveguide, if the central aperture diameter is constant from beginning to the end, it is known as "constant impedance" where the electric field is attenuated and
is diminished by the time wave reached the end of the waveguide
.
If the central aperture is tapered (larger opening in the beginning and gets narrower) it is
known as "constant gradient" where the electric field is maintained constant down the guide.

Can you explain for each mode, why that is true (why does having constant aperture means
E fields gets attenuated and why tapering helps maintain E field)

also, each cavities in the waveguide that are separated by the conducting discs are known as "coupled resonant cavities",
what does it mean by "coupled"?

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Citation?

Every piece of waveguide has associated loss. Loss causes signal "attenuation". Both of the pieces of waveguide you've described will have loss, and the signal will be attenuated - as in the signal at the end will have less power than the signal in.

As far as coupled, in your case it simply means joined. There will usually be a calibrated level of isolation between two coupled elements.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top