Tree Trunk Illusion: Does it Disappear Over the Horizon?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the perception of a tree's trunk as an observer moves away from it on a flat plane. It argues that the trunk does not disappear below the horizon, contradicting a claim made by another participant. The conversation highlights the importance of defining conditions accurately, particularly whether the surface is flat or spherical. It references Nathaniel Bowditch's work, which provides a method for estimating horizon distance based on eye height. Ultimately, clarity in the initial problem statement is emphasized to avoid confusion in such discussions.
Ryan Bruch
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Supposed there is a tree on a perfectly flat plane. If an observer in front of that tree moves further and further away from the tree, the tree would look smaller and smaller. When the observer moves further and further away, would the lower part of the tree's trunk seem to disappear as if sinking below the horizon?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. Why would it?
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
A person claimed that it does and that he had observed it before, on Earth though. These are his illustrations:

fig74.jpg


fig76.jpg


fig78.jpg


fig79.jpg


fig80.jpg
 
Earth is curved, an oblate spheroid.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
In more words, what Doug is telling you is that YOU were the one that specified a condition of a perfectly flat surface, thus, there is no such thing as a horizon. So, what is it? a flat surface or an sphere...please state your problem correctly and fully form the beginning.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
In Nathaniel Bowditch's American Practical Navigator is listed a most useful thumb-rule for estimating the distance to the horizon for practical heights of eye.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top