Trees to Loops: Computing SUSY Yang-Mills Amplitudes

Kea
Messages
859
Reaction score
0
From Trees to Loops and Back
Andreas Brandhuber, Bill Spence, Gabriele Travaglini
49 pages, 17 figures
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0510253

We argue that generic one-loop scattering amplitudes in supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories can be computed equivalently with MHV diagrams or with Feynman diagrams...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited:
No you won't find MHV in Road to Reality that's a later parley by Witten and company from string theory through twister space to QCD.

But did you follow that "Feynmann Tree Formula"? How neat! And how Feynman! Express the Feynman propagator as an advanced (retarded) propagator plus a \delta(P^2-m^2). Then use simple light cone techniques to simplify.

Of course this was all natural for RF, he had been working with advanced and retarded in Minkowski space since his PhD thesis. As the title of the book where the authors of this paper found the tequnique puts it: Magic without magic.
 
Magic without magic seems hard to get but it's also in:

"Selected papers of Richard Feynman: Closed Loop And Tree Diagrams,
867-887, Brown, L. M. (ed.)" which I have.

Laurie Brown is also the editor of the brandnew:

"Feynman’s Thesis: A New Approach To Quantum Theory"

http://physicsweb.org/press/10433
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/9812563806/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Richard Feynman's never previously published doctoral thesis.
I hope to receive my copy in 2 or 3 days :smile:


Regards, Hans
 
Hans de Vries said:
Is this a "revival" of Twistor Space?

One might well say so! As selfAdjoint says, its new physics, so not in Road to Reality. However, one can only imagine that Penrose would be pleased. Thanks for the Feynman references.

:smile:
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top